When you say the POV of the something that you want to talk about and give the them the prof to believe you that you right
Answer:
The economy has an actual output of 700 billion, and its potential ouput was 600 billion, therefore, we can say that the economy is already performing well, beyond potential, for this reason, the government should simply not intervene, because government intervetion reduces the economic efficiency of market outcomes.
If the economy was below potential, the government could tax some of the 25% income that households save, in order to increase spending. This would promote economic growth, bringing the economy closer to potential.
Answer:
The government will need to reduce spending by $60 billion
Explanation:
Expansionary gap is defined as a situation where the total output of an economy exceeds its potential output. That is the economy is performing above its long term potential as measured by GDP.
When this occurs the government will need to reduce spending to match output with economic needs.
Marginal propensity to consume is the proportion of an individual's income that is reserved for consumption.
In this case it is 4/5. This means individuals are willing to spend 4/5 of their income on consumption
The amount needed by the economy to meet consumption is:
Amount consumed= (4/5) * 300 billion
Amount consumed= $240 billion
Therefore
Excess cash= 300 billion - 240 billion = $60 billion
The government will need to reduce spending by $60 billion
Answer:
b.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in concept the researcher is considering them as two potentially different populations. This is why he separated them as two groups and is looking for the significant "differences" between them. Meaning that he believes that they are two different populations and is just looking to actually find what those differences are.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
its the most accurate answer.
essential things like a car or a home etc.
