1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bekas [8.4K]
3 years ago
8

Write a paragraph to explain what verdict you would reach if you were a member of the jury. Would you find the defendant guilty

or not guilty of committing the crime?
Be sure to consider:
the evidence.
the prosecutor’s argument.
the defense lawyer’s argument.
Law
1 answer:
Vitek1552 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Although a description of the case was not provided for this question, we can confirm that as a member of the jury, when deciding guilt, you should hold the prosecution to the burden of proof.

<h3>What we know about the burden of proof.</h3>
  • In any criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof.
  • The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • When acting as a member of the jury, you should hold your decision to this standard.
  • You should only vote guilty if there are no logical doubts present as to the arguments presented by the prosecution.

Therefore, we can confirm that when acting as a jury member, you should base your decision on the prosecution's ability to prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.

To learn more about criminal law visit:

brainly.com/question/1869780?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
Write a proposal to the county school board arguing whether seat belts should be installed on school buses to make them even saf
horsena [70]

Answer:

Seat belt usage improves passenger behavior and reduces driver distractions. Seat belts offer protection against injuries in rollover or side impact crashes. Seat belt usage in school buses reinforces good safety habits.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Most violent crimes happen in summer months <br><br> True or false?
Aloiza [94]
It depends on the like city or whatever but it’s true in most parts
5 0
3 years ago
Did Carole baskin kill her husband don ?
borishaifa [10]
Yes she sure did. Exotic joe said so it must be true.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications? a. Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney

Explanation:

Dues and subscriptions are professional expenses. They are tax-deductible subject to the 2% Adjusted Gross Income.

Professional subscriptions refer to any fees that the person may have to pay to get his business or profession registered with a "governing body" for which a license is required.

One cannot claim tax back on professional fees and subscriptions.

Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications.

4 0
3 years ago
3. What is alternative dispute resolution? What are the various techniques of alternative dispute resolution, and what are their
mylen [45]
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the procedure for settling disputes without litigation, such as arbitration, mediation, or negotiation. ADR procedures are usually less costly and more expeditious. They are increasingly being utilized in disputes that would otherwise result in litigation, including high-profile labor disputes, divorce actions, and personal injury claims.

A mediator makes primarily procedural suggestions regarding how parties can reach agreement. Occasionally, a mediator may suggest some substantive options as a means of encouraging the parties to expand the range of possible resolutions under consideration. A mediator often works with the parties individually, in caucuses, to explore acceptable resolution options or to develop proposals that might move the parties closer to resolution.

Ombuds
Ombuds are individuals who rely on a number of techniques to resolve disputes. These techniques include counseling, mediating, conciliating, and fact finding. Usually, when an ombud receives a complaint, s/he interviews the parties, reviews files, and makes recommendations to the disputants. The ombuds do not impose solutions. The power of the ombud lies in his/her ability to persuade the parties to accept his/her recommendations.

Peer Review
Peer Review is a problem-solving process where an employee takes a dispute to a group or panel of fellow employees and managers for a decision. The decision is not binding on the employee, and s/he would be able to seek relief in traditional forums for dispute resolution if dissatisfied with the decision. The principal objective of peer review is to resolve disputes early before they become formal complaints.

Typically, the panel consists of employees and managers who volunteer for this duty and who are trained in listening, questioning, and problem-solving skills as well as the specific policies and guidelines of the panel.

Fact Finding
Fact Finding is the use of an impartial expert (or group) selected by the parties, by the agency, or by an individual with the authority to appoint a fact finder, in order to determine what the "facts" are in a dispute. The fact finder may be authorized only to investigate or evaluate the matter presented and file a report establishing the facts in the matter. If used as an ADR technique, the findings of fact must remain confidential.

Early Neutral Evaluation
Early Neutral Evaluation uses a neutral or an impartial third party to provide an objective evaluation, sometimes in writing, of the strengths and weaknesses of a case. Under this method, the parties will usually make informal presentations to the neutral party to highlight their respective cases or positions.

Settlement Conference
Settlement conferences are meetings which are typically conducted by a settlement judge or referee to assist the parties in reaching a mutually acceptable settlement of the disputed matter. Agencies may have their own settlement conferences without the presence of an EEOC administrative judge, provided the parties agree. The role of the settlement judge is similar to that of a mediator in that the judge assists the parties procedurally in negotiating an agreement. Some judges may provide the parties with specific substantive and legal information about what the disposition of the case might be if it were to go to court or hearing.

Facilitation
Facilitation involves the use of techniques to improve the flow of information in a meeting between parties to a dispute. The term facilitator is often used interchangeably with the term mediator, but a facilitator does not typically become as involved in the substantives issues as does a mediator. The facilitator focuses more on the process involved in resolving a matter. The facilitator generally works with all of the participants at once and provides procedural directions as to how the group can efficiently move through the problem-solving steps of the meeting and arrive at the jointly agreed upon goal. The facilitator focuses on procedural assistance and remains impartial to the topics under discussion.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Your local police department is concerned with this year's most recent crime statistics. The police chief meets with city offici
    12·1 answer
  • What is the role of government in today’s society?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about railroad crossings is FALSE?
    5·2 answers
  • 1. What is Ms. Roman’s employment background?
    5·2 answers
  • State two rights of women and children in relationships​
    13·1 answer
  • Seven more than a number, x, is at least 20
    15·1 answer
  • Check out this app! It's millions of students helping each other get through their schoolwork. https://brainly.app.link/qpzV02Ma
    15·2 answers
  • If punishments were harsh enough, there would be no crime.
    15·2 answers
  • 4. How are interviews and interrogations distinguished from each other?
    6·2 answers
  • List 6 assaultive-type crimes, the elements required to prove the crime, and an example of each​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!