1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bekas [8.4K]
2 years ago
8

Write a paragraph to explain what verdict you would reach if you were a member of the jury. Would you find the defendant guilty

or not guilty of committing the crime?
Be sure to consider:
the evidence.
the prosecutor’s argument.
the defense lawyer’s argument.
Law
1 answer:
Vitek1552 [10]2 years ago
7 0

Although a description of the case was not provided for this question, we can confirm that as a member of the jury, when deciding guilt, you should hold the prosecution to the burden of proof.

<h3>What we know about the burden of proof.</h3>
  • In any criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof.
  • The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • When acting as a member of the jury, you should hold your decision to this standard.
  • You should only vote guilty if there are no logical doubts present as to the arguments presented by the prosecution.

Therefore, we can confirm that when acting as a jury member, you should base your decision on the prosecution's ability to prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.

To learn more about criminal law visit:

brainly.com/question/1869780?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
List four types of work that attorneys may do for client
Tpy6a [65]
Lawyers research applicable laws and prior court rulings, they prepare legal documents, and when necessary argue cases in court.
8 0
2 years ago
In the case of ________, the Supreme Court gave the lower courts some discretion over how they applied the test for qualified im
asambeis [7]

Answer:

Pearson v. Callahan

Explanation:

This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.

Hope this Helps!

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is U.S political parties outlined in the U.S constitution?
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

The United States Constitution is silent on the subject of political parties. The Founding Fathers did not originally intend for American politics to be partisan.

7 0
2 years ago
If you are taking a legal dose of a prescribed drug and you are involved in a collision:
sergey [27]

Answer: The drivers on prescription drugs are hard to convict is said in an article in the New York Times. So the drivers are also at the risk of arrest who are taking a legal dose of prescribed drug.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Many people believe that the "driving under the influence" involves only the consumption of illegal drugs and the consumption of booze. This will result in the penalizing the people who are involved in this and suspending the license of that person.

But if you are on a dose of a legal drug and then an accident happens, then also the person is at the risk of an arrest. But it is not very easy to convict that person because he is under the influence of a drug which has been prescribed to him by the doctor. In this case, it is not easy to take test of that person to know the level of drugs or taking any charge against him is also tough by the police.

3 0
3 years ago
Refusing to hire or promote an individual or making other employment decisions based upon factors such as ethnicity, religion, o
konstantin123 [22]

Refusing to employ or promote an individual or making other employment decisions based upon factors such as race, religion, or gender is referred to as workplace ratification.

<h3>Ratification</h3>

Ratify means to authorize or enact a legally binding act that would not otherwise be critical in the absence of such permission. In the constitutional context, countries may ratify an modification to an existing/adoption of a new constitution.

Ratification describes the international act whereby a state signifies its consent to be attached to a treaty if the parties intended to show their approval by such an act.

To learn more about ratification visit the link-

brainly.com/question/23842955

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone please help!
    11·1 answer
  • The vehicle code includes regulations regarding?
    15·2 answers
  • In order to initiate a civil lawsuit in a federal court or in a state court, what must you do?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME DO THIS
    7·1 answer
  • 3. When you pull into the middle of an intersection to properly
    13·2 answers
  • 6. The characteristics of the alcohol-troubled family are also seen in families
    9·2 answers
  • The government can take your property for
    12·2 answers
  • This branch has the Supreme Court and District Courts.
    13·2 answers
  • A example of a question that is not leading
    13·2 answers
  • A non-custodial interrogation is not an option after the individual has
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!