Lawyers research applicable laws and prior court rulings, they prepare legal documents, and when necessary argue cases in court.
Answer:
Pearson v. Callahan
Explanation:
This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Hope this Helps!
Answer:
The United States Constitution is silent on the subject of political parties. The Founding Fathers did not originally intend for American politics to be partisan.
Answer: The drivers on prescription drugs are hard to convict is said in an article in the New York Times. So the drivers are also at the risk of arrest who are taking a legal dose of prescribed drug.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Many people believe that the "driving under the influence" involves only the consumption of illegal drugs and the consumption of booze. This will result in the penalizing the people who are involved in this and suspending the license of that person.
But if you are on a dose of a legal drug and then an accident happens, then also the person is at the risk of an arrest. But it is not very easy to convict that person because he is under the influence of a drug which has been prescribed to him by the doctor. In this case, it is not easy to take test of that person to know the level of drugs or taking any charge against him is also tough by the police.
Refusing to employ or promote an individual or making other employment decisions based upon factors such as race, religion, or gender is referred to as workplace ratification.
<h3>Ratification</h3>
Ratify means to authorize or enact a legally binding act that would not otherwise be critical in the absence of such permission. In the constitutional context, countries may ratify an modification to an existing/adoption of a new constitution.
Ratification describes the international act whereby a state signifies its consent to be attached to a treaty if the parties intended to show their approval by such an act.
To learn more about ratification visit the link-
brainly.com/question/23842955
#SPJ4