1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aliya0001 [1]
2 years ago
10

What is the final step for creating a chart in PowerPoint?

Business
1 answer:
Sergio [31]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

step 1: click instead> Chart

step 2: click th3 chart type and then double click th3 chart you want.

step 3: in th3 worksheet that appears, replace the placeholder data with your own information.

step 4: when you insert a chart, small buttons appear next to the upper right corner.

step 5: when finished, close th3 worksheet

You might be interested in
Sargent Corporation applies overhead cost to jobs on the basis of 70% of direct labor cost. If Job 210 shows $10,500 of manufact
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

labor cost = 15,000

Explanation:

We are going to use the formula for applied overhead and solve for the cost driver, which in this case is labor cost.

labor\: cost \times rate = applied \: overhead \\applied \: overhead \div rate = labor\: cost

labor cost * 0.70 = 10,500

10,500/0.70 = labor cost

labor cost = 15,000

5 0
3 years ago
The point has been reached where a biotechnology research and development company must expand by building a new facility. The se
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

A. A

Explanation:

Location A is best suited for the management. Location A offers Excellent Labor climate, Utilities and Markets. It is fair in Quality of Life and Taxes. The best possible alternative is location A for the management of biotech research company.

8 0
3 years ago
What should you do first if you receive a phone that there has been fraudulent behavior use on your credit card?
pentagon [3]
Call the bank and have them cancel the card
8 0
4 years ago
Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that <em>C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>.

Explanation:

  • So <em>two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons</em><em> of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require </em><em>a pollution permit for each ton</em><em> of pollution emitted into the air</em>.
  • <em>Each firm gets 40 pollution permits</em><em>, which it can</em><em> either use or sell </em><em>to the other firm</em>. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
  • <em>It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates</em><em> before it is emitted into the air</em>. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they get them for less than $200 each</u>.
  • It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they sell for higher than $100</u>.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be <em>Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars

For Firm B, the cost would be

60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: <em>If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and </em><em>would end up losing money</em>! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, <em>or it would end up losing money as well</em>. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

  • Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
  • Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
  • Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

<em>Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option</em>.

4 0
3 years ago
The reason that we want to develop a confidence interval for the population mean is because:_____.
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

3. the sampling distribution of the sample mean is normally distributed.

5. the value of the sample mean varies from sample to sample.

Explanation:

We develop confidence interval for population mean because

a. the sampling distribution of the sampling mean is normally distributed. For us to do this we must first ensure that the sample mean is large enough

B. The value of the sample mean is not the same for all samples it varies from sample to sample. Therefore it it is better that an internal is given with the probability that the parameter falls into it.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Indra nooyi, ceo and chairman of pepsico is considered the most powerful woman on fortune’s 50 most powerful women’s list, uses
    10·1 answer
  • The strategy of convincing a customer to buy a higher-priced item than he or she had originally intended is called
    15·1 answer
  • Calculator The document authorizing the issuance of materials from the storeroom is a a.materials requisition b.purchase requisi
    9·1 answer
  • Organization psychology studies _________. a. the principles of selecting and evaluating workers studies b. how work environment
    12·1 answer
  • On January 1, 2017, Hi and Lois Company purchased 12% bonds, having a maturity value of $300,000, for $322,744.44. The bonds pro
    12·1 answer
  • An investment in Pear Computers has an initial value of $5,000. A second investment in Macrosoft Computers has an initial value
    14·1 answer
  • Biarritz Corp. is growing quickly. Dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 28 percent for the next three years, with the gro
    9·1 answer
  • Moral hazard is a barrier to financing global growth because:_______
    14·1 answer
  • Tiffany, who is married to Saul, takes out a $1,000,000 life insurance policy on Saul's life in 2008. Two years later they get d
    7·1 answer
  • A company is considering investing in a project that is expected to return $310,000 three years from now. how much is the compan
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!