I wholeheartedly agree and think it’s practically self-evident.
Here’s an excellent example from history.
For 28 years, the Berlin Wall separated East Berlin from West Berlin and was the most heavily militarized border crossing in the Western hemisphere. In 1989, during a press conference with western media, Gunther Schabowski was handed a note explaining a change in policy governing border crossing. Several discussions took place about making a show of opening the border between East and West Germany, but nobody informed Schabowski.
At the end of the press conference, he appears to have remembered the note belatedly, and read it verbatim—which was not what was intended. When asked about when the border would open, he assumed it was immediate.
The reality of course was that East Germany had no intention of opening the border, and certainly not immediately.
Within hours, the border crossing was practically buried under thousands of East Germans eager to be reunited with their families and other loved ones after 28 years on the press conference, which had been broadcast live.
The East Germans believed what they were told: Schabowski said immediately, and they intended to go immediately.
Border guards kept calling for instructions, until finally, they relented.
Perception became reality, and the border between East and West Berlin opened, spelling the de facto end of the separation of Germany.
273 viewsView 2 Upvoters · Answer requested by Never Wong
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
Answer:
16.54%
Explanation:
We have to applied the rate formula that is shown in the attachment.
The NPER shows the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $2,500
Future value or Face value = $5,375
PMT = $0
NPER = 6 years - 1 years = 5 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER,PMT,-PV,FV,type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the annual rate of return is implied is 16.54%
Answer:
lack of anonymity
Explanation:
According to my research on whistle-blowing systems within organizations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the major issue that the program seems to have is a lack of anonymity. All whistle-blower systems are designed to be completely anonymous so that anyone who uses the system to do the right thing and report people who are breaking the law or rules are not mentioned and face backlash from co-workers. Apparently, the system that Company X is either not anonymous or is not adhering to the anonymity policy.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The accounts affected are Ross company and rent account
