Answer:
Each had an executive; most had a two-house legislature. They were different because they were new states were self-governing, had constitutions/bills of rights, and allowed more people to vote.
This depends completely on the type of monarchy in question. In an absolute monarchy, for instance, the king or queen holds full absolute power. But in a constitutional monarchy the king or queen's power is limited.
The Bill of Rights consists of 10 amendments that explicitly guarantee certain rights and protections to US citizens by limiting the power of the federal government. The First Amendment prevents the government from interfering with the freedoms of speech, peaceable assembly, and exercise of religion.
The English Bill of Rights created a constitutional monarchy in England, meaning the king or queen acts as head of state but his or her powers are limited by law. Under this system, the monarchy couldn't rule without the consent of Parliament, and the people were given individual rights.
A, as we need to communicate more
<span>He thought that the United States was different than any other nation because it was founded upon democratic principles.</span>