In this market, it can be concluded that at a price level of $100 per unit, there is <em>C. a shortage of 0.4 million units.</em>
- This market shortage occurs because 0.4 million units of the goods were not supplied. There is excess demand and shortage in supply.
- The market demand increased from the equilibrium quantity of 5 million units to 5.2 million while the market supply reduced from the equilibrium quantity of 5 million units to 4.8 million.
- The shortage of 0.4 million units results from the difference between the quantity demanded (5.2 million) and the quantity supplied (4.8 million) as a result of reduced price.
Thus, the market shortage shows the reduced willingness of suppliers to supply goods at the new price of $100 per unit instead of at the acceptable equilibrium price of $120 per unit.
Read more about market surplus and shortage at brainly.com/question/24385458
Answer:
The medicine should be taken with food
Explanation:
Drugs work effectively when taken with food
Answer:
D. harms the society by interfering with the economy's natural process.
Explanation:
In order to get out of recession, the fed should reduce the tax rates, which would in return lead to higher disposable income of the consumers, and then there will be an increase in the demand.
On the other hand the sale of bonds would even further increase the recession, as there will be more cash crunch in the economy. A decrease in reserve ratio will be a long time taking solution, so it would not provide an immediate solution.
MCQ
But, if the fed interferes with the short run equilibrium in the hope of giving short run benefits, it will hamper the economy's natural process to attain a new equilibrium as discussed in the paragraph above. Hence, option D is the correct answer
Option A and C are incorrect, because, employment is not much affected with lowering of income tax. On, the other hand, inflation levels rise, when there is a cut in income tax, as it gives more currency in the economy, hence even C is incorrect.
The other day, someone asked me about the last time my ethics had been tested at work and how I reacted.
I wasn’t sure how to respond. It’s a good question, and I wanted to answer it. Still, I hesitated to reveal too much about some of the less-than-honest bosses I’ve reported to in the last two decades.
These are bosses who lied, gossiped about their staff to other staff, broke confidences, fudged numbers to governmental agencies, botched payroll tax withholdings and covered it up, and willfully and recklessly turned a blind eye to leadership abuse — for starters.
Answer:
The options are not properly aligned.Find the same question with proper alignment in the attached.
A winning strategy fits the company's internal and external situation, builds sustainable competitive advantage, and improves company performance.
Explanation:
For a strategy to be tagged a winning one,it must carefully take into the consideration the internal and external environments that the business operates in,such that internal strengths and weaknesses can be discovered as well as external opportunities and threats.
In addition, it must also consider the capabilities ans skills peculiar to the business that are difficult to imitate by others, in essence competitive advantage.
Above all, the strategy must positively impact the bottom-line,in that the business records positive strong performances period after period.
