All categories

3 years ago

Help needed, im timed!

Business

2 answers:

Elina [12.6K]3 years ago

7 0

A would be your best answer. Hope I helped!

Marianna [84]3 years ago

6 0

I am positive that the answer is a Network consultant.
Hope this helps.

You might be interested in

Mr. Drucker uses a periodic review system to manage the inventory in his dry goods store. He likes to maintain 15 sacks of sugar

ElenaW [278]

yes

Explanation:

because thays tuff stuff idk

7 0

2 years ago

Garcia Wholesale Plumbing has seen its sales in the Southeast triple in the past two years. Materials handling director Barb Pet

jok3333 [9.3K]

I would say option D

5 0

3 years ago

PLS HELP 100 POINTS PLS HELP ME

AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

If i was shana i would save up her money for collage because first her tution into the school and if she dont like there then she screwed 2nd if she dont save her money then she don get a car an go see er fams

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

The real risk-free rate is 3.05%, inflation is expected to be 3.60% this year, and the maturity risk premium is zero. Ignoring a

natulia [17]

Answer:

Ans. The equilibrium rate of return on a 1-year Treasury bond is 6.65% (please check the explanation)

Explanation:

Hi, well, this type of bonds exist so people can avoid the time value of money risk, in other words, to keep money save from inflation and provide a risk free return at the same time. From a part of the text I can tell that the person who wrote it wanted to add up the risk free rate and the inflation rate, that is 3.05%+3.60% =6.65%.

This is why I wrote this answer, but the truth is that since they are both effective rates (risk free rate and inflation), they need to be add as effective rates, that is:

$(1+r(e))=(1+rf)*(1+Inf)$

Therefore

$r(e)=(1+rf)*(1+Inf)-1$

$r(e)=(1+0.0305)*(1+0.036)-1=0.0676$

So the real equilibrium rate of return is 6.76%, but for the sake of the question, I wrote 6.65%.

Best of luck.

6 0

3 years ago

A manufacturer has an estimated practical capacity of 90,000 machine hours, and each unit requires two machine hours. The follow

nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Of the following factors, the manufacturer's production volume variance is most likely to have been caused by:

D. Temporary employment of workers with lower skill levels than originally anticipated.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Estimated practical capacity = 90,000 machine hours

Machine hours per unit = 2

Estimated production units based on capacity = 45,000 (90,000/2)

Budgeted Actual

Variable overhead = $200,000 $240,000

Actual fixed overhead = $450,000 $442,000

Machine hours 90,000 88,000

Units produced 45,000 42,000

Estimated units to be produced based on standard machine hour

= 44,000 units (88,000/2)

Variance between standard units to be produced and actual = 2,000 (44,000 - 42,000) Unfavorable

5 0

3 years ago