Answer:
48
Step-by-step explanation:
p/100×25=12
p/4=12
(p/4)×4=12×4
p=48
I hope this makes sense
Pi/4 radians
You're looking for the angle that has a secant of sqrt(2). And since the secant is simply the reciprocal of the cosine, let's take a look at that.
sqrt(2) = 1/x
x*sqrt(2) = 1
x = 1/sqrt(2)
Let's multiply both numerator and denominator by sqrt(2), so
x = sqrt(2)/2
And the value sqrt(2)/2 should be immediately obvious to you as a trig identity. Namely, that's the cosine of a 45 degree angle. Now for the issue of how to actually give you your answer. There's no need for decimals to express 45 degrees, so that caveat in the question doesn't make any sense unless you're measuring angles in radians. So let's convert 45 degrees to radians. A full circle has 360 degrees, or 2*pi radians. So:
45 * (2*pi)/360 = 90*pi/360 = pi/4
So your answer is pi/4 radians.
Answer:
Generally the barrier width is 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The tunneling probability required is 
The barrier height is 
The electron energy is 
Generally the wave number is mathematically represented as
![k = \sqrt{ \frac{2 * m [V_o - E]}{\= h^2} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=k%20%20%3D%20%20%5Csqrt%7B%20%5Cfrac%7B2%20%2A%20m%20%5BV_o%20-%20E%5D%7D%7B%5C%3D%20h%5E2%7D%20%7D)
Here m is the mass of the electron with the value 
h is is know as h-bar and the value is 
So
![k = \sqrt{ \frac{2 * 9.11 *10^{-31 } [0.4 - 0.04] * 1.6*10^{-19}}{[1.054*10^{-34}^2]} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=k%20%20%3D%20%20%5Csqrt%7B%20%5Cfrac%7B2%20%2A%209.11%20%2A10%5E%7B-31%20%7D%20%5B0.4%20-%200.04%5D%20%2A%201.6%2A10%5E%7B-19%7D%7D%7B%5B1.054%2A10%5E%7B-34%7D%5E2%5D%7D%20%7D)
=> 
Generally the tunneling probability is mathematically represented as
![T = 16 * \frac{E}{V_o } * [1 - \frac{E}{V_o} ] * e^{-2 * k * a}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=T%20%20%3D%2016%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7BE%7D%7BV_o%20%7D%20%20%2A%20%5B1%20-%20%5Cfrac%7BE%7D%7BV_o%7D%20%5D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-2%20%2A%20k%20%2A%20a%7D)
So
![1.0 *10^{-5} = 16 * \frac{0.04}{0.4 } * [1 - \frac{0.04}{0.4} ] * e^{-2 * 3.0736 *10^{9} * a}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1.0%20%2A10%5E%7B-5%7D%20%3D%2016%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B0.04%7D%7B0.4%20%7D%20%20%2A%20%5B1%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B0.04%7D%7B0.4%7D%20%5D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-2%20%2A%203.0736%20%2A10%5E%7B9%7D%20%2A%20a%7D)
=> 
Taking natural log of both sides
![ln[6.944*10^{-6}] = -2 * 3.0736 *10^{9} * a}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=ln%5B6.944%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%5D%20%3D%20-2%20%2A%203.0736%20%2A10%5E%7B9%7D%20%2A%20a%7D)
=> 
=> 
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
By gradient, if you mean the "slope" of the linear function, then you have to find two points of the graph and use the "rise over run strategy". Given two coordinates, (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) of a linear function in the form y=mx+b, the slope of the line is (y2-y1)/(x2-x1). This shows the amount of "rise", or the vertical change, and the amount of "run", which is the horizontal change. Rise/Run gives the steepness of the line. The slope can also be modeled by Δy/Δx, which is the change in y over the change in x
Plugging in the given points (0,5) and (-5,0):
(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)= (5-0)/(0-(-5)) = 5/5 = 1
Answer:
17/24
Step-by-step explanation:
(a+b)÷2
a= 2÷3
b= 3÷4
=(2/3 + 3/4)÷2
=(8+9/12)÷2
=17/24