$\lim_{t \to 14.75^{-}} f(t) = 66$ .
$\lim_{t \to 14.75^{+}} f(t) = 10$ .
$\lim_{t \to 14.75} f(t)$ does not exist as $\lim_{t \to 14.75^{-}} f(t) \ne \lim_{t \to 14.75^{+}} f(t)$ .

<h3>How to determinate the limit in a piecewise function</h3>

In a <em>piecewise</em> function, the limit for a given value exists when the two <em>lateral</em> limits are the same and, thus, continuity is guaranteed. Otherwise, the limit does not exist.

According to the definition of <em>lateral</em> limit and by observing carefully the figure, we have the following conclusions:

$\lim_{t \to 14.75^{-}} f(t) = 66$ .
$\lim_{t \to 14.75^{+}} f(t) = 10$ .
$\lim_{t \to 14.75} f(t)$ does not exist as $\lim_{t \to 14.75^{-}} f(t) \ne \lim_{t \to 14.75^{+}} f(t)$ .

To learn more on piecewise function: brainly.com/question/12561612

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

Which description is paired with its correct expression? seven less than the quotient of two and a number squared, increased by

Svetach [21]

Answer:

the second description and and expression is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

the first one is wrong because it says 7 minus while it should be minus 7

6 0

3 years ago