Answer:
Both judicial activism and judicial restraint opine that the courts should uphold all acts and laws of Congress and legislatures unless they oppose the United States Constitution.
Hope this helps?
Explanation:
Answer:
Hi, names Sergeant von, . I see that you were wondering what this means??.
Representative Payee – an individual or organization we appoint to receive and manage the Social Security or SSI benefits of another person. A representative payee must use the funds they receive for the use and benefit, and in the best interest of, the beneficiary.
Explanation:
We appoint a payee to receive the Social Security or SSI benefits for anyone who can't manage or direct the management of his or her benefits. . A payee's main duties are to use the benefits to pay for the current and future needs of the beneficiary, and properly save any benefits not needed to meet current needs. Im pretty sure that this will help you!:)
Answer:
No, as hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.
The advice that should be provided to the bank manager about the pitfalls of accepting security from Wisteria's parents, including the necessary precautions the bank should take, include:
- The bank should ensure that it provides adequate explanations to Wisteria's parents about the nature of the overdraft and the financial state of Acme Pty Ltd.
- The bank should further explain the limitations of the guarantee involved with respect to the mortgage of the home.
- The bank should discover if Wisteria's parents' home is under another mortgage.
- The bank should take precautions that it does not fall into the pits that the classical case of Commercial Bank of Australia v. Amadio by not indulging itself in unconscionable conduct with the parents of Wisteria.
<h3>What is unconscionable conduct?</h3>
Unconscionable conduct is harsh conduct that goes against good conscience.
Unconscionable conduct is usually described as oppressive without considering its unfairness.
Thus, in seeking Wisteria's parents to mortgage their home to the bank, the bank manager should be careful not to mingle its business dealings with persons who lack the capacity to enter into a valid guarantee for Acme Pty Ltd.
Learn more about unconscionable conduct at brainly.com/question/13720902
New Jersey v. TLO is the case would most likely be cited by his lawyer.
<h3>What is New Jersey v. TLO?</h3>
According to the Juvenile Court's ruling, a school official may check a student if they have a reasonable suspicion that a violation has been or is being committed, or if they have a good basis to think that the search is required to uphold school rules or maintain discipline. The Court determined that the school administrator's search did not violate the Fourth Amendment after applying this criterion to the circumstances of this case. T.L.O. received a one-year probationary period after being deemed delinquent.
Remanded the matter back to the Juvenile Court to determine whether T.L.O. had intentionally & voluntarily waived her Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. Affirmed the Juvenile Court's finding that there was no Fourth Amendment violation.
To know more about New Jersey v. TLO, visit:
brainly.com/question/11169658
#SPJ1
