1)They are very reliable because they are almost always accurate.All science in the courtroom has to be verified in order to be used in the court to prove that their tests are accurate and reliable and can be used as an evidence in court. Reliability is measured by how much your machines have been validated ,if a forensic scientist in a court say the evidence is true but did not have a proper reliability , than people can question how true this test can actually be. Hard science is consisted of chemistry,biology and physics are the most reliable evidence.
2)The reliability of the analytical science in the courtroom is growing. This is because of the fact that analytical science involves comparison between the characteristics and features of the suspected specimens with those obtained from the criminals or victims. The analytical science plays an important role in proving a fact that a crime has been committed, the place of crime and establishing the identity of the culprit.
HOPE THIS HELPS..
Answer:
the answer is C the Commerce Clause
Explanation: Monson and Raich sued, claiming that enforcing Federal law against them would violate the Commerce Clause, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, and the doctrine of medical necessity.
Answer:
The answer is Hundred years' war i hope this is helpful too you
Explanation:
this war was a deadly war many people died but king never lost hope
Answer:
2nd one.
Explanation:
blood evidence should be tested immediately before effected by the environment to collect dna and calculate blood splatter angles. blood is more reliable than weapons as we cant always prove it was in possession of the offender at the time. if its a ballistic weapon that can be tracked through the serial number the weapon is not first priority. as they are not effected greatly by the environment as bio fluids are.
