1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fredd [130]
3 years ago
15

What questions do filibusters raise about the American Democracy?

Law
1 answer:
elixir [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:A filibuster is a tactic by which opponents of a bill in the Senate use their unique right to unlimited debate as a way to prevent or delay the Senate from ever voting on a bill. They attempt to talk the bills to death. The filibuster raises profound questions about American democracy through opposing all types of legislation and they do this because it is used by a minority to defeat a majority.

You might be interested in
Why did the Supreme Court find their suspension unconstitutional?
mr Goodwill [35]

Because the armbands were deemed "Pure Speech," the Supreme Court ruled that their suspension is unconstitutional. The armbands had no negative effects on academic performance.

When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional matter, that decision is essentially definitive; only the constitutional amendment process or a subsequent judgment by the Court may overturn the Court's rulings. However, fresh legislative action may be done in response to the Court's interpretation of legislation.

Legislation, method, or action is unconstitutional if it directly contravenes the constitution. Unless the nation in issue has a system in place for challenging laws as being unconstitutional, all others are regarded as constitutional.

To learn more about Supreme Court

brainly.com/question/10739091

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
PLEASE HELP:(((how do communication skills make a good law enforcement officer? (answer in a 5-10 sentence paragraph)
Nina [5.8K]

Answer: Communication skills are key to make a good law enforcement officer regarding problems in difficult situations. It is mainly important because having effective communication skills builds trust, respect, and understanding to the situation, and to the other individual. What makes a good law enforcement officer is one that knows how to communicate in order to achieve and solve problems or concerns using reliable and effective information. Therefore, the officer can operate through the difficult problem no matter the circumstance if using key skills through communication. Without this requirement, an officer would not be able to handle various situations which can lead to a more chaotic, difficult, unnecessary, or even dangerous situation.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Rolonda is a firearms investigator studying the striations on a spent bullet. Which part of the weapon creates these striations?
lord [1]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

By examining unique striations, scratches left behind on the bullet and weapon, individual fired rounds can be, but not always are, linked back to a specific weapon. These striations are due to the rifling inside the barrel of handguns. Rifling spins the bullet when it is shot out of the barrel to improve accuracy.

5 0
3 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
¿cómo se exige el derecho a la vida?
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

El derecho a la vida se exige constantemente, a través del propio ejercicio de este derecho. A su vez, el ejercicio del derecho a la vida como derecho natural inherente a todo ser humano se da a través del ejercicio de los otros dos derechos naturales fundamentales: la libertad y la búsqueda de la felicidad. Así, el derecho a la vida se exige viviendo plenamente, en libertad y buscando constantemente la felicidad propia y de nuestros seres queridos.

A su vez, el derecho a la vida también se exige incluyendo el respeto por este derecho en leyes fundamentales como constituciones nacionales y tratados de derechos humanos, que reconozcan este derecho como esencial a la condición humana.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone help me?!?!?! This is due in 15 minutes!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Will mark Brainliest!)
    7·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    10·1 answer
  • as I read the new farm laws I don't found anything against the farmers so why are they protesting. please be neutral. this quest
    10·1 answer
  • One major difference between civil and criminal cases is that:
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be a case brought to civil court
    13·2 answers
  • Which numbered pair of phrases best completes this diagram of the
    14·2 answers
  • What particular form must a will follow?
    10·1 answer
  • How has the confirmation power change reflected<br> political trends in American government?
    5·1 answer
  • 100 POINT QUESTION
    6·2 answers
  • What is judicial independence
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!