Using the "Thinking at Margin" methodology, the relevant statement for a television maker to consider while making a choice is as follows: the average cost of ten TVs is one hundred dollars apiece. Option C. This will be discussed in further detail below.
<h3>What exactly does "Thinking at Margin" entail?</h3>
In most cases, it means giving some consideration to the action that will come next in your plan. The word "marginal" may also be used to signify "additional." The first glass of lemonade you drink on a hot day will quench your thirst, but successive glasses may not have the same impact on you.
When you contemplate at the margin, you are considering what the next or succeeding action will mean for you on an individual level.
In conclusion, using the "Thinking at Margin" technique, the following are the essential points for a television producer to take into consideration before making a decision when it comes to television programming: The usual cost of creating ten televisions is one thousand dollars each. Alternative C
Learn more about Thinking at the Margins by visiting this link: brainly.com/question/4468044 #SPJ1
Answer:
a.
- The quality of goods available to consumers
- The costs of air and water pollution
- The value of babysitting services, when the babysitter is paid in cash and the transaction isn't reported to the government
b. investment; decreases; no overall change
Explanation:
a. GDP only measures goods that have monetary value so when a good cannot be properly quantified in terms of cash, it is difficult to account for it in GDP. Also, even if the good has monetary value for the Government was unaware of it, they will be unable to use it in the calculation of GDP.
For these reasons, the quality of goods available to consumers, the costs of air and water pollution and the value of babysitting services, when the babysitter is paid in cash and the transaction isn't reported to the government will not be a part of GDP calculation.
b.<em> When a U.S. company purchases and imports wood from Brazil to use to build new houses within the United States, this purchase increases the </em><em><u>investment</u></em><em> component of GDP while also </em><em><u>decreasing</u></em><em> net exports by the same amount. Therefore, the purchase of wood from Brazil causes </em><em><u>no overall change </u></em><em>in US GDP. </em>
Purchasing raw materials for use in production is considered Investment by GDP. However, since it was imported it will reduce Net Exports which means that the transaction would cancel itself out in the GDP calculation as it would both increase investment and decrease Net exports by the same amounts.
Answer:
The first and third statements are correct. These statements are:
The utility function of a risk-averse person exhibits the law of diminishing marginal utility.
The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the less satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar.
Explanation:
A risk-averse individual is the one who tends to avoid taking risks. In other words, such an individual prefers lower returns with known risks as opposed to higher returns with unknown risks.
The utility curve for a risk-averse individual is concave in shape. This implies diminishing marginal utility, that is, the satisfaction derived from each additional dollar gained is less than that derived from the previous dollar. Therefore, the first and third statements are both correct.
The second statement is false because risk-averse individuals do not over-estimate the probability of losing money. The fourth statement is also false because risk-averse individuals receive less satisfaction from each additional dollar, not more.
Answer:
A. The crossover point in units is 9000 units
B. Alternate B or Proposal B should be chosen
Explanation:
a.
Let x be the number of units.
The profit equation for option 1 can be written as (20-11)x - 62000
The profit equation for option 2 can be written as (20-14)x - 35000
The crossover point is where both optons yield equal profit thus equation 1 = equation 2.
(20-11)x - 62000 = (20-14)x - 35000
9x - 62000 = 6x - 35000
9x - 6x = 62000 - 35000
3x = 27000
x = 27000 / 3
x = 9000 units
b.
At 8300units,
Profit from proposal A is = 9(8300) - 62000 = 12700
Profit from proposal B is = 6(8300) - 35000 = 14800
Thus option B is more profitable at this unit.
