Answer:
b. Due process has not been followed by the employer.
Explanation:
In the workplace when there is a case that could lead to dismissal, it requires the employer to first of all carry out an investigation to determine what actually happened. The facts could differ from the claims made against her.
She should also be allowed to to explain herself, this could lead to get exonerating herself or disclosing relevant information the employer did not know.
Amber can take legal action against the employer for not following due process in firing her.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
Expenditures—2017 in the amount of $200. (C.)
Explanation:
This scenario describes a record that was less than the actual amount spent on the General Fund supplies. The amount recorded was $2,000, meanwhile the actual amount spent was $2,000. This entails that an amount worth $200 was not recorded, hence it will be debited as expenditures, but the question now is where the debit will be recorded?
This review was done in January 2017, meaning that the income statement for the 2016 Fiscal year must have been balanced, hence the amount will be an expenditure recorded in 2017, but the particulars will have a description that it was a carried over expenditure from 2016. Therefore $200 will be debited from 2017 as expenditures.
Answer:
$6,000,000
Explanation:
Change in risk = 0 in 1,000 to 1 in 1,000 = 0 to 0.001 = +0.001
Change in wage = $30,000 to $36,000 = +$6,000
Therefore:
wage/risk = 6,000/0.001
= $6 million or $6,000,0000
The value of a human life for workers with these characteristics should a cost-benefit analyst use is $6,000,000 because workers are willing to receive an extra $6,000 for a 1 in 1,000 increase in risk of death, implying a value of life of $6 million)Value of human life for workers with these characteristics = $6 million .
In order words the workers require $6,000 to accept a death risk of .001. The value of life implied by this is $6,000/.001 = $6,000,000.
