1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eduard
2 years ago
8

write one to two paragraphs discussing your thoughts and prior knowledge on the question prompt: "Are there any examples in our

modern history that might reflect a similar tension during the Enlightenment movement between the monarchy and aristocracy?"
History
1 answer:
Leya [2.2K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A perfect example would be the events that played out in Wakanda in 2018. In Wakanda there was a divide between King T'Challa and a leader named W'kabi. W'kabi wanted Wakanda to give aid to the rest of Africa and not hoard the technologies and weapons that they possess. Erik Kilmonger wanted to go a step further and help all people of African descent, regardless of where they live, in a Pan-Africanism movement. T'Challa did not want to open up Wakanda but after Erik Kilmonger staged a coup d'etatand overthrew T'Challa, we see a sharing of power throughout the world, benefitting all those of African descent. T'Challa takes power back, but still keeps in place the Pan-Africanism Aide that was the goal of his predecessor.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Othniel, Israel's first judge, delivered Israel from Canaanite oppression.<br><br> True<br> False
astraxan [27]

Answer:

The correct answer is false.

Explanation:

False is correct answer, because Othniel wasn't the one who deliberate them from Canaanite oppression. It was actually general Barak.

On the other hand Othniel delivered Israel from Mesopotamian oppression.

5 0
3 years ago
Why was James I resistant to working with Parliament?
larisa86 [58]
<span>This was a declaration by the House of Commons of England reaffirming their right to freedom of speech in the face of King James' belief that they had no right to debate foreign policy. Many Members of Parliament were unhappy with James' foreign policy. They opposed the Spanish Match and wished for a war against Spain. The MPs believed that if they conceded that they had no right to debate matters which displeased the King, Parliament would be obsolete</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELPPPPPP MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
maxonik [38]
1) = B) Administering the law is a function of the executive branch of government. Writing the laws and repealing of laws are functions of the legislative branch, and challenging legislation in court is a function of the judicial branch.


2) = D) Limiting the president's ability to commit troops to an undeclared war was the reason why Congress enacted the War Powers Resolution in 1973. The resolution, passed by Congress over President Nixon's veto, requires the President of the United States to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to any military action. Armed forces cannot remain deployed for more than 60 days (plus a 30-day withdrawal period), unless Congress authorizes the use of military force or enacts a declaration of war.


3) = B) Executive agreements differ from treaties in that a treaty requires approval by the senate an executive agreement does not. In the 19th century, about half of the United States' international agreements were treaties and half executive agreements. In the 20th and now 21st cenutry, more than 90% of US international agreements have been created as executive agreements.


<span>4) = A) The president's executive powers of clemency an example of checks and balances because clemency can overturn federal court decisions. So clemency functions as an instance of the executive branch challenging and changing a decision of the judicial branch.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Remember, many Confederate soldiers were not necessarily racist, nor did they live on plantations. What are some reasons a South
vredina [299]

Answer:

It is not about plantations or being racits for may it was about not ceceding to Nationalism. Many Southernist believed in an idealism known as sectionalism. This meant that they believed that they wanted the state government to have more power than the national government. Many also believed that the industrial growth that the North wanted to persue was not the best option, because many in the South wanted to continue the economy on another path through farming.  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which statement best explains
lianna [129]

D). After retiring,

workers who

were paid

well in

industrialized

nations

moved to

different

countries

where the

cost of living

was lower.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the United States today, what gives money its value?
    11·2 answers
  • Jose needs to memorize words on a vocabulary list for German class. He has 24 words to memorize, and he is two-thirds done. How
    10·1 answer
  • Details about the battle at guilford courthouse and who won.
    15·1 answer
  • What is meant by this statement the united states constitution is the nation's most important export?
    9·1 answer
  • However the colonists forced to Penn to agree that only the
    5·1 answer
  • Which constitutional amendment requires electors in the Electoral College to cast separate votes for President and Vice Presiden
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not one of the main goals of foreign policy
    7·1 answer
  • How was the civilian population able to meet labor demands after the us entered ww1?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was Hercules such a legend
    15·2 answers
  • Someone please help!!!!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!