The best answer from the options that proves that the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data is: ( Statement 1 ) Yes, because the points have no clear pattern
X Given Predicted Residual value
1 3.5 4.06 -0.56
2 2.3 2.09 0.21
3 1.1 0.12 0.98
4 2.2 -1.85 4.05
5 -4.1 -3.82 -0.28
The residual value is calculated as follows using this formula: ( Given - predicted )
1) ( 3.5 - 4.06 ) = -0.56
2) ( 2.3 - 2.09 ) = 0.21
3) ( 1.1 - 0.12 ) = 0.98
4) (2.2 - (-1.85) = 4.05
5) ( -4.1 - (-3.82) = -0.28
Residual values are the difference between the given values and the predicted values in a given data set and the residual plot is used to represent these values .
attached below is the residual plot of the data set
hence we can conclude from the residual plot attached below that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data because the points have no clear pattern ( i.e. scattered )
learn more about residual plots : brainly.com/question/16821224
I believe the answer is 4x + 8. you multiply 4 by x which makes 4x. Than you multiply 4 by 2, making 8.
(7 and 7/16) is the simplest form.
Answer:
a) sample size is 40
Step-by-step explanation:
(a)
minutes
Margin of error, E is 75 seconds E=75/60= 1.25 minutes.
The level of significance
for 95% level of significance
For 95% confidence interval
from standard deviation table
Sample size required, n

Rounding off, n=40
Sample size =40
Keywords:
95% confidence, sample size, Wall Street Journal
The answer to your question is -3 !!