Answer:
$3,233.12
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Purchase value of two coins = $790
First coin rate = 7.3%
Second coin rate = 6.7%
So, after considering the above information, the amount worth in 20 years
= Purchase value of two coins ×(1 + interest rate)^number of years
= $790 × (1 + 0.073)^20
= $790 × 4.0925541961
= $3,233.12
Answer:
-$7,270
Explanation:
Accounts receivable is the amount that is owed to the business by various parties that is due within a particular period.
In this instance there was an aging analysis done that estimated that $6,700 will be uncollectible. This will result in a bad debt expense of -$6,700.
Before now there was a balance of -$570 in allowance for doubtful accounts. Meaning there was a debit balance attributed to uncollected debt.
The total debt balance will now be -6,700-570 = -$7,270
Descriptive research casual research predictive research and exploratory research.
So stuff like....
Product testing
Advertising testing
Satisfaction and loyalty analyst
brand awareness and reach
pricing research
Answer:
D. Management Information Systems.
Explanation:
Management information system may be defined as it is the system of information which is to be used for the purpose of making the decision, coordinating, controlling, analyzing and visualization of information in an organization.
Therefore the learning of the management information system includes person, technology and process in an organizational context.
While value chain may be defined as it the primary activity and support activity that add values to the customers.
Answer: charge a monopoly price
Explanation:
Patents provide an exclusive right to the firm in the production and sale of a drug. This provides the firm exclusive market power to decide the price and the quantity and therefore the firm is able to charge a monopoly price and also earn monopoly profits.
When an existing patent expires and the generic producers enter the market, the price reduces due to an increase in the supply of the erstwhile patented drug. This will reduce the monopoly profit of incumbent producers. Therefore, they will seek to deter the entry of generic drug makers in order to safeguard their monopoly profits and price.
Therefore, incumbents were willing to give enough to potential entrants so as to make them delay entry to charge a monopoly price.
The effect of the 2013 Supreme Court decision allowing legal action against these companies is increase in the cost of pay-for-delay agreements and also reduce incumbent profits from these agreements.
