Your classmate's error about AB and DC being complimentary and parallel is that they misapplied the alternate angle property.
<h3>Why are AB and DC not parallel?</h3><h3 />
There isn't enough evidence presented in the diagram to say that AB and DC are parallel.
The evidence required would be proof that angle AWZ is equal to angle WZY.
Instead, all we have is that angle AWZ and angle XYC are equal which does not tell us what we need to know about AB and DC being parallel.
Find out more on properties of parallel lines at brainly.com/question/24607467
#SPJ1
Step-by-step explanation:
a. P(mites OR ticks) = P(mites) + P(ticks) − P(mites AND ticks)
P(mites OR ticks) = 0.80 + 0.30 − 0.20
P(mites OR ticks) = 0.90
b. P(no ticks | mites) = P(no ticks AND mites) / P(mites)
P(no ticks | mites) = (0.80 − 0.20) / 0.80
P(no ticks | mites) = 0.75
c. If two events are independent, then P(A and B) = P(A) × P(B).
P(mites AND ticks) = 0.20
P(mites) × P(ticks) = 0.80 × 0.30 = 0.24
They are not independent.
Y²(9y² + 4y - 9)
Simplify.
(y² · 9y²) + (y² · 4y) + (y² · -9)
Simplify.
9y⁴ + 4y³ - 9y²
~Hope I helped!~
