Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

6

How many tons are equal to 36,000 pounds?

2 answers:

patriot [66]2 years ago

8 0

Hello There! I'll be glad to help you! :0

Question:

How many tons are equal to 36,000 pounds?

Answer:

<h2><u><em>18 tons </em></u></h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>To convert a pound measurement to a ton measurement, divide the weight by the conversion ratio.</em>

<em />

<em>Since one ton is equal to 2,000 pounds, you can use this simple formula to convert:</em>

<em />

<em>tons = pounds ÷ 2,000</em>

<em>The weight in tons is equal to the pounds divided by 2,000.</em>

<em />

<em>And you could multiply 2,000 by 18 and get the answer 36,000</em>

<em />

<em />

Hope This Helps you!

Have an Amazing day!

<h2><u>If you have any questions please ask! :]</u></h2>

dangina [55]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

$\large\boxed{\boxed{\underline{\underline{\maltese{\pink{\pmb{\sf{\: Solution :- \: 18 \: tons}}}}}}}}$

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that,

1 pound = 0.0005 ton.

To convert pound to tons, we need to divide the value of the mass by 2000. So,

36,000 pounds in tons

= 36,000/2000

= <u>18 tons (3rd option)</u>

________

Hope it helps!

$\mathfrak{Lucazz}$

You might be interested in

Kiersten runs a website that helps people learn to programme. Every month, Kiersten receives a subscription fee of a 10 from eac

blondinia [14]

1,200?? I'm not really sure tho

6 0

3 years ago

Lmk if you can slide answer rn

sattari [20]

A. 70in³ i hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago

Surface area is the sum of the areas of all the surfaces of a three-dimensional object.

Dmitry [639]

Answer: True

Think of a 3D box. It has 6 faces and the surface area is the total of all six individual rectangular faces. This idea applies to any polyhedron.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following graphs shows the solution set for the inequality below? 3|x + 1| < 9

Bas_tet [7]

Step-by-step explanation:

The absolute value function is a well known piecewise function (a function defined by multiple subfunctions) that is described mathematically as

$f(x) \ = \ |x| \ = \ \left\{\left\begin{array}{ccc}x, \ \text{if} \ x \ \geq \ 0 \\ \\ -x, \ \text{if} \ x \ < \ 0\end{array}\right\}$ .

This definition of the absolute function can be explained geometrically to be similar to the straight line $\textbf{\textit{y}} \ = \ \textbf{\textit{x}}$ , however, when the value of x is negative, the range of the function remains positive. In other words, the segment of the line $\textbf{\textit{y}} \ = \ \textbf{\textit{x}}$ where $\textbf{\textit{x}} \ < \ 0$ (shown as the orange dotted line), the segment of the line is reflected across the <em>x</em>-axis.

First, we simplify the expression.

$3\left|x \ + \ 1 \right| \ < \ 9 \\ \\ \\\-\hspace{0.2cm} \left|x \ + \ 1 \right| \ < \ 3$ .

We, now, can simply visualise the straight line, $y \ = \ x \ + \ 1$ , as a line having its y-intercept at the point $(0, \ 1)$ and its <em>x</em>-intercept at the point $(-1, \ 0)$ . Then, imagine that the segment of the line where $x \ < \ 0$ to be reflected along the <em>x</em>-axis, and you get the graph of the absolute function $y \ = \ \left|x \ + \ 1 \right|$ .

Consider the inequality

$\left|x \ + \ 1 \right| \ < \ 3$ ,

this statement can actually be conceptualise as the question

$``\text{For what \textbf{values of \textit{x}} will the absolute function \textbf{be less than 3}}"$ .

Algebraically, we can solve this inequality by breaking the function into two different subfunctions (according to the definition above).

Case 1 (when $x \ \geq \ 0$ )

$x \ + \ 1 \ < \ 3 \\ \\ \\ \-\hspace{0.9cm} x \ < \ 3 \ - \ 1 \\ \\ \\ \-\hspace{0.9cm} x \ < \ 2$

Case 2 (when $x \ < \ 0$ )

$-(x \ + \ 1) \ < \ 3 \\ \\ \\ \-\hspace{0.15cm} -x \ - \ 1 \ < \ 3 \\ \\ \\ \-\hspace{1cm} -x \ < \ 3 \ + \ 1 \\ \\ \\ \-\hspace{1cm} -x \ < \ 4 \\ \\ \\ \-\hspace{1.5cm} x \ > \ -4$

*remember to flip the inequality sign when multiplying or dividing by

negative numbers on both sides of the statement.

Therefore, the values of <em>x</em> that satisfy this inequality lie within the interval

$-4 \ < \ x \ < \ 2$ .

Similarly, on the real number line, the interval is shown below.

The use of open circles (as in the graph) indicates that the interval highlighted on the number line does not include its boundary value (-4 and 2) since the inequality is expressed as "less than", but not "less than or equal to". Contrastingly, close circles (circles that are coloured) show the inclusivity of the boundary values of the inequality.

3 0

2 years ago

Which system of equations below has infinitely many solutions? y = –3x 4 and y = –3x – 4 y = –3x 4 and 3y = –9x 12 y = –3x 4 and

Flura [38]

the equations y = –3x + 4 and 3y = –9x + 12 have infinitely many solutions. option B is correct.

<h3>What is the linear system?</h3>

It is a system of an equation in which the highest power of the variable is always 1. A one-dimension figure that has no width. It is a combination of infinite points side by side.

Condition for the parallel lines.

L1, ax + bx + c = 0

L2, dx + ey + f = 0

If $\rm \dfrac{a}{d} = \dfrac{b}{e} = \dfrac{c}{f}$ then lines have infinitely many solutions.

<h3>Which system of equations below has infinitely many solutions?</h3>

y = –3x + 4 and 3y = –9x + 12

On comparing we have

a = -3 , b = 1, and c = 4

d = -9 , e = 3, and f = 12

Then their ratio will be

$\rm \dfrac{1}{3} = \dfrac{-3}{-9} = \dfrac{4}{12}\\\\\rm \dfrac{1}{3} = \dfrac{1}{3} = \dfrac{1}{3}$

Hence y = –3x + 4 and 3y = –9x + 12 have infinitely many solutions.

Thus the option B is correct.

More about the linear system link is given below.

brainly.com/question/20379472

7 0

2 years ago