Answer:
$56,950
Explanation:
We will calculate the operating cash flow as follow;
OCF = {[($55 - $28.62) 8,500 ] - $170,000} × (1 - 0.35) + ($62,000 × 0.35)
= {[$224,230] - $170,000} × 0.65 + ($21,700)
= $35,249.5 + $21,700
= $56,950
Therefore, the operating cash flow is $56,950
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Answer:
Jamal
Explanation:
Given that
Number of required slides = 50 slides
Creating slides Per hour = 15 slides
Bill amount per hour = $750
So by considering the above information, Bette's opportunity cost of creating slides would be
= Bill amount per hour ÷ creating slides per hour
= $750 ÷ 15 per hour
= $50
For making 50 slides, the opportunity cost would be
= $50 × 50 slides
= $2,500
And, Jamal opportunity cost is 30% lower, so it would be
= $50 - $50 × 30%
= $50 - $15
= $35
And, the billing rate is 25% higher, so it would be
= $750 + $750 × 25%
= $750 + $187.50
= $937.50
So in one hour, it would be
= $937.50 ÷ 35 slides
= 26 slides
Based on the creating slides, the Jamal gains a competitive advantage over Bette
As Bonnie is not currently looking for a job after she quit
and take care of her daughter, the survey conducted by the bureau of labor
statistics that Bonnie will now be counted as an individual who is not part of
the labor force because she is not working at the moment.
<span> </span>
One thing that can cause a shift in the demand curve is a change in one of the determinants of demand.
The law of demand can be shown as Pat wants to buy more candy bars at $1 than at $2
<h3>What does the law of demand say?</h3><h3 />
The law of demand posits that people will demand more of a good when the price is lower as opposed to when it is higher. This is why Pat will want to buy more candy bars when the price is lower at $1 as opposed to $2.
The demand curve will shift when there is a change in one of the determinant of demand such as the income of people and the price of substitutes.
Find out more on the law of demand at brainly.com/question/24500422
#SPJ1
