Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
No because (1,2) falls on the line, and the line is a dotted line, which means that any point on the line is not a solution to the inequality.
The first question asks who sold more rolls. So start with figuring out how many Christie sold.
5 total - 1 2/3 left = 3 1/3 sold
you can convert the numbers to improper fractions with the same denominator. Like this:
5 x (3/3) - (3+2)/3
15/3 - 5/3 = 10/3
10/3 = 3 1/3
So now we know Christie sold more because 3 1/3 dozen is more than 2 1/2 dozen.
The part asks how many more.. Subtract the amounts the two girls sold.
3 1/3 - 2 1/2
10/3 x (2/2) - 5/2 x (3/3)
20/6 - 15/6 = 5/6
Christie sold 5/6 dozen more rolls. A dozen is 12 rolls so if you wanted to go further you just multiply 12 x 5/6 = 10 rolls
Make use of prime factorizations:

Both terms have a common factor of
:

- - -
The second one is not true! We can write

Both terms have a common factor of
:

Since
, and
, we'd still have to show that
is a multiple of 6. This is impossible, because
and there is no multiple of 2 that can be factored out.
Answer:
1st option
Step-by-step explanation:
given the graph of f(x) then the graph of f(x) ± c is a vertical translation of f(x)
• if - c then a shift down of c units
• if + c then a shift up of c units
then for f(x) + 4 is a shift up of 4 units