All categories

3 years ago

Management at Work

Business

1 answer:

Elan Coil [88]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

A: inputs

B: inequitable

C: outcomes

Explanation:

This passage relates to equity theory, which is a way of thinking about the distribution of resources in <em>just</em> ways. In this theory, inputs are defined as the contributions that each participant makes, which entitle him to rewards or costs.

On the other hand, outcomes are defined as the positive and negative consequences that the individual perceives as a consequence of his relationship to others. This theory states that employees seek to maintain equity between the inputs that they bring to a job and the outcomes that they receive from it.

You might be interested in

ME Company has a debt-equity ratio of .57. Return on assets is 7.9 percent, and total equity is $620,000. a. What is the equity

Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

8.06

Explanation

Debt equity ratio=Debt÷ Equity
Debt÷Equity=0.57
Equity=620,000 in this question
Debt=620,000*0.57=353,400.
Assets=Debt+Equity
Assets in this case=353,400+620,000=973,400
Return on asset=Profit for the year=7.9%*973,400=76898.6
Equity Multiplier=Total Equity/Profit for the year
Equity Multiplier=620,000/76898.6=8.06

5 0

3 years ago

John constantly needs assistance from his colleagues at work. He feels helpless and lacks conviction in his ideas. Which type of

V125BC [204]

The correct answer should be a fatalist decision maker

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You can buy property today for $3 million and sell it in 5 years for $4 million. (You earn no rental income on the property.) (L

kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

a) Present Value of sales = $2,722,332.78

b) Property is not attractive. NPV$ (277,667.21)

c) Property is attractive. NPV-$520,874.79

Explanation:

The present value of the property

PV = S× (1+r)^(-n)

S- Sales value

r- interest rate -8%

n- number of years

PV - present value

PV = 4,000,000× 1.08^(-5) = $2,722,332.78

b. Is the property investment attractive to you?

We calculated the PV of the investment as follows

NPV = PV of sales value - initial cost

= 2,722,332.78 - 3,000,000=$ (277,667.21)

The property investment is not attractive because it will produce a loss in capital i.e negative NPV

To determine we will calculate the NPV again with considering the additional rental income

PV of annual rent = 200,000 × (1-1.08^(-5))/0.08= 798,542.00

NPV = 798,542.00 + 277,667.2119 - 3,000,000 =520,874.79

The property is attractive as it produces positive NPV

8 0

4 years ago

Flint Co. has a held-to-maturity investment in the bonds of Schuyler Corp. with a carrying value of $76,700. Flint determined th

Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

The journal entry to record the reduction in value would be:

Account Title Debit Credit

Loss on Impairment 11,700

Debt Investments (Available-for-Sale) 11,700

$76,700 - $65,000 = 11,700

In this case, a loss has occurred and the individual security should be written down. If Flint Co. has already recognized an unrealized holding loss—equity, an additional entry is needed to reverse this amount as well as eliminate the fair value adjustment (available-for-sale) account.

5 0

3 years ago

Joe's Tasty Burger has determined that its production facility has a design capacity of 400 hamburgers per day. The effective ca

Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

Design Capacity Utilization= 75%

Production efficiency = 120%

Explanation:

Okay, so the question is to determine both the design and the effective capacity utilization measures and make a conclusion from there

1. The Capacity Utilization = The Actual Output/ Design Capacity

Actual Output= 300 hamburgers a day

Design Capacity = 400 Hamburgers a day

Therefore Capacity Utilization = 300 hamburgers/400 hamburgers x 100

= 75%

2. The Efficiency of the production = The Actual Output / The Effective Capacity

Actual Output = 300 Hamburgers a day

Effective Capacity = 250 hamburgers

= 300 Hamburgers/ 250 Hamburgers x 100

= 120%

Conclusion

First we see that the actual utilization of capacity is more better than the effective capacity and this is good. Also, the Design Capacity is higher than the actual capacity utilization which should also be expected as design capacity is a calculation based on ideal conditions that may be not realistic in real life conditions.

3 0

3 years ago