1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lakkis [162]
2 years ago
13

Why was president Kennedy unable to pass the civil rights act of 1964?

History
1 answer:
Gnesinka [82]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Kennedy had been cautious about civil rights because it had been a very close election and he wanted to keep the support of as many people and legislators as possible. Conflict over integration and civil rights had been escalating during the spring of 1963.

You might be interested in
How did the Radical Republicans plans differ from Licolns and Johnson's?
Klio2033 [76]
Unlike the radical Republicans<span> Reconstruction </span>plan Lincoln did<span> not want to punish the South but instead wanted them to rejoin the Union as quickly as possible. </span>Johnson's Plan<span>: President </span>Johnson<span> (who was </span>Lincolns<span> successor). ... The </span>radical Republicans<span> also gave more protection to the freed black men than </span>Johnson<span>.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP THANK YOU!:)
Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

I am pretty sure Group B

Explanation:

Group B includes more violent actions.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help a girl out, due soon ‍♀️
shutvik [7]

Answer: D. Declaring war

Explanation: The national government was in charge of preparing for war against Britain. The Articles of Confederation gave Congress the authority to appoint military officials, but not to draft soldiers. It was mainly up to the states if they wanted to contribute men for the war.

6 0
3 years ago
I need a description of the Jews of the Renaissance and Reformation​
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

The 15th through the 18th centuries involved major changes in Jewish life in Europe. The conflicts, controversies, and crises of the period impacted Jews as much is it did other Europeans, albeit perhaps with different outcomes. In social, economic, and even intellectual life Jews faced challenges similar to those of their Christian neighbors, and often the solutions developed by both to tackle these problems closely resembled each other. Concurrently, Jewish communal autonomy and cultural tradition—distinct in law according to its own corporate administration, distinct in culture according to its own set of texts and traditions—unfolded according to its own intrinsic rhythms, which, in dialogue with external stimuli, produced results that differed from the society around it. The study of Jewish life in this period offers a dual opportunity: on the one hand, it presents a rich source base for comparison that serves as an alternate lens to illuminate the dominant events of the period while, on the other hand, the Jewish experience represents a robust culture in all of its own particular manifestations. Faced with these two perspectives, historians of the Jews are often concerned with examining the ways in which Jews existed in separate and distinct communities yet still maintained contact with their surroundings in daily life, commercial exchanges, and cultural interaction. Further, historians of different regions explore the ways that Jews, as a transnational people, shared ties across political frontiers, in some cases, whereas, in others cases, their circumstances resemble more closely their immediate neighbors than their coreligionists abroad. Given these two axes of experience—incorporation and otherness—the periodization of Jewish history resists a neat typology of Renaissance and Reformation. And yet, common themes—such as the new opportunities afforded by the printing press, new modes of thought including the sciences, philosophy, and mysticism, and the emergence of maritime economic networks— firmly anchor Jewish experiences within the major trends of the period and offer lenses for considering Jews of various regions within a single frame of reference. To build a coherent survey of this period as a whole, this article uses the major demographic upheavals of the 14th and 15th centuries and the subsequent patterns of settlement, as the starting point for mapping this period. These are followed by significant cultural developments, both of Jewish interaction with its non-Jewish contexts, the spaces occupying a more “internal” Jewish character, and of those boundary crossers and bridges of contact that traversed them before turning to the upheavals and innovations of messianic and millenarian movements in Judaism.

4 0
3 years ago
What did the new farmers of new england face
7nadin3 [17]
Farming, making a living, slavery, religion, i don't know if this is exactly what you're looking for but heres a rough idea. 

<span>
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Was Wilfred’s request related to suicide? Explain your answer.
    7·1 answer
  • Some help me do this, i don't have a lot of time and i got a lot of other things to do.
    6·2 answers
  • Which shift in worldview was an important part of the European Renaissance?
    12·2 answers
  • What policies of Pennsylvania reflected Quaker beliefs?
    6·2 answers
  • Why where some Frenchmen skeptical of the American model
    11·2 answers
  • George Calvert (5 points)
    15·1 answer
  • Loyal opposition definition
    12·1 answer
  • Why is it difficult for historians to study early civilization
    5·1 answer
  • French soldiers brought home American ideas about government and rights, including news of the Declaration of Independence. One
    9·2 answers
  • What where the contributions of Obama as a US president towards Pan African movements
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!