<span>Emergent norm theory, which is the theory that, during a crisis, crowds will ignore previously know behavioral patterns and norms and create new ones in light of the problem. The goal is to fix the crisis, so they will adapt their behavior to whatever is needed to reach that.</span>
Answer:
Congressional districts must have roughly equal populations if this is feasible.
In an opinion authored by Hugo L. Black, the 6-3 majority held that the district court had jurisdiction because debasement of the right to vote as a result of a state congressional apportionment law was justiciable and not subject to dismissal for "want of equity." The Court further held that the apportionment statute was invalid because it abridged the requirement of Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution that The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several states, and the electors in each state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature.
Justice Clark concurred in part and dissented in part. He agreed with the majority that the trial court erred in dismissing the case for nonjusticiability and want of equity, but stated further that Article 1, section 2, does not forbid disproportionate congressional districts and that the case should be remanded for a hearing to determine whether the apportionment statute violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Justice Harlan dissented on the ground that the Constitution expressly provides that state legislatures and Congress have exclusive jurisdiction over problems of congressional apportionment of the type involved in the case.
Justice Stewart stated that he joined with Mr. Justice Harlan's dissent except insofar as there might be implied in that dissent the view that the issues were not justiciable.
Explanation:
in certain situations this phrase is good to use. not in cases with mental problems, however it is good to expose people to something like that. When people having actual things that need attention, it is very unsafe and foolish to use this term. However if someone complains about other, quite miniscule things, it's better to use it then. Using it in the right context is key.
Hello! The answer to your question would be as followed:
Yes segregation is indeed still relevant in today's society. There have been many clear patterns of racial segregation such as basic economic statuses, in Suburbia, and also most black and latinos will be in their own racial groups other than whites. Then, in compare of white neighborhoods than black and latinos, you would see the poverty in the latinos and black neighborhoods than in the whites. Based on the passage "Separate and Unequal in Suburbia.", it states that "blacks and Hispanics with incomes over $75,000 live in neighborhoods with a higher poverty rate than do whites who earn less than $40,000." Yes this is considered segregation.
(P.S) This answer is not meant to offend anyone