All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is being constructed in the image.

Mathematics

1 answer:

Sliva [168]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

3. a line perpendicular to a given line through a point not on the line

Step-by-step explanation:

The point not on the line suggests that choices 1 and 3 are possibilities. The fact that the dotted line is not parallel (and is perpendicular) to the solid line suggests that choice 3 is applicable and choice 1 is not.

The short arcs are equidistant from the end points of the chord that intercepts the larger arc. Hence the line through the crossing point of the short arcs and the point on the other side of the line will be the perpendicular bisector of the chord, and will be perpendicular to the solid line. Creating that perpendicular is likely the purpose of the construction.

You might be interested in

You’ve a sponge that is 66 square inches. How many times would you use 3 inches and 1 inch length

storchak [24]

11 you need to use 3 33 11

5 0

2 years ago

Tina is finding the quotient of. Is she correct? If not, what changes should be made?

Mice21 [21]

For this case, we must find the quotient of

$(15x ^ 3 + 12x ^ 2-9x)$ divided by $3x$ , to verify if Tina was correct.

So:

$\frac {15x ^ 3 + 12x ^ 2-9x} {3x} =\\\frac {15x ^ 3} {3x} + \frac {12x ^ 2} {3x} - \frac {9x} {3x} =\\5x ^ 2 + 4x-3$

So, Tina was wrong, she had to divide by 3x.

Answer:

Option B

5 0

3 years ago

The variable term in 2x^3-4

siniylev [52]

I assume that it’s an equation so:
2x^3-4=0
x=(2)^(1/3)

8 0

3 years ago

Determine the intercepts of the line.<br> 4x – 1= 3y + 5<br> x-intercept:(_,_)<br> y-intercept:(_,_)

BARSIC [14]

Answer:

X-intercept: (1.5,0)

y-intercept: (0,-2)

the 1.5 can also be written as 3 over 2 in fraction form.

Hope this helps! :)

4 0

2 years ago

The test statistic of zequals2.32 is obtained when testing the claim that pgreater than0.3. a. Identify the hypothesis test as b

Sonja [21]

Answer:

a) We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion p is greatr than 0.3, so then the system of hypothesis are.:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.3$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.3$

Right tailed test

b) $p_v =P(z>2.32)=0.0102$

c) So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.1$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is higher than 0.3

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a: Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion p is greatr than 0.3, so then the system of hypothesis are.:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.3$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.3$

Right tailed test

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

Calculate the statistic

For this case the statistic is given by $z_{calc}= 2.32$

Part b: Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>2.32)=0.0102$

Part c

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.1$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is higher than 0.3

6 0

3 years ago