Answer: -2, 0 and 0, 2 and 2, 4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x < - 4
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
2x - 2 > 4x + 6 ( subtract 2x from both sides )
- 2 > 2x + 6 ( subtract 6 from both sides )
- 8 > 2x ( divide both sides by 2 )
- 4 > x , thus
x < - 4
Solution: The missing reason in Step 8 is substitution of
.
Explanation:
The given steps are used to prove the formula for law of cosines.
From step 5 it is noticed that our equation is
..... (1)
From step 7 it is noticed that the value of
is
.
So by substituting
for
in equation (1) we get the equation of step 8, i.e.,

Hence, the missing reason in Step 8 is substitution of
.
The blanks in this two-column proof should be filled as follows:
<u>Statements Reasons</u>_______________
m∠1 = m∠3 Given
m∠CBA = m∠ABE + m∠CBD Angle Addition Postulate
m∠ABE = m∠3 + m∠2 Substitution Property of Equality
m∠CBD = m∠3 + m∠2 Substitution Property of Equality
m∠ABE ≅ m∠CBD Transitive Property of Equality
<h3>What is the Angle Addition Postulate?</h3>
In Mathematics, the Angle Addition Postulate states that the measure of an angle formed by two (2) angles that are placed side by side to each other is equal to the sum of the measures of the two (2) angles.
This ultimately implies that, the Angle Addition Postulate can be used to determine the measurement of a missing angle in a geometric figure or it can be used for calculating an angle that is formed by two (2) or more angles such as m∠CBA = m∠ABE + m∠CBD.
Read more on Angle Addition Postulate here: brainly.com/question/24746945
#SPJ1
Answer:
The statement that cushion A is twice as popular as cushion B cannot be verified
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that:
Sample size n=38
Type a size A 
Type a size B
Generally the probability of choosing cushion A P(a) is mathematically given by


Generally the equation for A to be twice as popular as B is mathematically given by

Therefore Hypothesis

Generally the equation normal approx of p value is mathematically given by



Therefore from distribution table


Therefore there is no sufficient evidence to disagree with the Null hypothesis 
Therefore the statement that cushion A is twice as popular as cushion B cannot be verified