Answer:
2, 4, and 5 refers to scientific revolution while on the other hand, the remaining statements shows scientific observation.
Explanation:
Cloning has the potential to significantly benefit a great many people, so it should not be considered immoral or risky is refers as scientific observation.
A scientist thinks that he might find serious inconsistencies in the fossil record if he conducts an excavation in a new location is refers scientific explanation because explanation is needed for it which can drawn from the scientific observation.
The rocks present in western Africa and eastern South America formed at the same place and at the same time is scientific observation because the scientists takes the data.
Even if modern organisms are found in ancient portions of the fossil record, this wouldn't challenge the theory of evolution in any way is refers to scientific explanation.
The cloning of organisms is an exciting area of study, and more resources should be be devoted to it so it is refers as scientific explanation.
The age, type, and composition of ancient rocks in western Africa are nearly identical to the age, type, and composition of rocks in eastern South America is scientific observation which is taken by the scientist through research.
Answer:a. Draw Punnett squares for each couple (you may need to do more than 1 square/ couple)
Baby 2 MUST belong to the Browns because Mr. Brown is the only parent with an A allele to
contribute… then the rest works out as follows:
b. To which parents does baby #1 belong? Why? Hint you may want to refer to your Punnett
squares.
Baby 1 must belong to the Smiths, because they are the only ones with the possibility of EACH
having a recessive allele to pass down to the baby, Mr. Brown has type AB blood and therefore
only has the dominant A and dominant B alleles – no recessive allele possible.
Explanation:
I think it's the simple columnar epithelium.
