Answer:
65 because 12 plus 9 is 21 then 3 times 21 is 65
The whole thing flips around and ends up being t = 3k/?
I think answer should be thousands please give me brainlest I hope this helps let me know if it’s correct or not okay thanks
Answer:
2/15
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is:

The alternate hypotesis is:

The test statistic is:

In which X is the sample mean,
is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
A researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 94 hours. Assume the standard deviation is known to be 6.
This means, respectively, that 
The test-statistic is:



The pvalue is:
2(P(Z < -2.69))
P(Z < -2.69) is the pvalue of Z when X = -2.69, which looking at the z-table, is 0.0036
2*(0.0036) = 0.0072
0.0072 < 0.01, which means that the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.