Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
If the units are reworked, income will increase by $5,800.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Number of units= 1,000
Sell as-is= $4.3
Rework cost= $2.8
Selling price= $12.9
<u>Because the original cost will remain constant in both options, we will not take them into account.</u>
Sell as-is:
Effect on income= 1,000*4.3= $4,300
Rework:
Effect on income= 1,000*(12.9 - 2.8)
Effect on income= $10,100
If the units are reworked, income will increase by $5,800.
Answer:
Correct option is (b)
Explanation:
In business communication, when replying to a claim made by the customer, the sender should begin with the good news that customer's request is complied with. This should be done to gain the customer's confidence.
The customer might be looking forward to this in the reply and he will be happy to read that, thereby retaining the customer.
Amazon’s efforts to offer customers the option to return or purchase items in the physical world is a decision that most closely aligns with <u>Physical Evidence</u>.
This is because the retail marketing mix has seven elements.
These elements are usually known as the 7 Ps, including product, price, promotion, place, people, process, and physical evidence.
It is expected that the <u>Physical Evidence</u> should give the customers the sense of making a purchase.
This could be anything from collecting a physical receipt or having the opportunity to return a defective product.
The Physical Evidence gives the customers an impression of the value of what they purchase goods.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>Physical Evidence</u>.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/15850455
Answer:
a) The correlation coeffcient is given by:
And replacing we got:
b) For this case we can conclude that we have a strong, negative linear association between the two stock prices.
Explanation:
Part a
For this case we have the following info:
represent the sample deviation for the variable X
represent the sample deviation for the variable Y
represent the covariance between the variables X and Y
The correlation coeffcient is given by:
And replacing we got:
Part b
Describe the relationship between prices of these two stocks.
For this case we can conclude that we have a strong, negative linear association between the two stock prices.
