Ruling out rival hypotheses, Findings consistent with several hypotheses
require additional research to eliminate these hypotheses. More five principles
of critical thinking are: (1.) Correlation vs. Causation, the fact that two
things are associated with each other doesn’t mean that one causes the other.
(2.) Replicability, a finding must be capable of being duplicated by
independent researchers following the same recipe. (3.) Occam’s Razor,
if two hypotheses explain a phenomenon equally well, we should generally select
the simpler one. (4.) Falsifiability, claims
must be capable of being disproved. (5.) Extraordinary Claims, the more a
claim contradicts what we already know, the more persuasive the evidence must
be before we should accept it.
Kennedy indicates that the ability to monitor weapons should be:
- <u>B Shared by the leaders of all nations
</u>
<u />
President John Kennedy in his inaugural address of 1961 gave the speech that while security of individual nations should be monitored individually, that there is a need for collective effort and cooperation among every nation to end insecurity and tackle terrorism.
Furthermore, he stated that there should be an independent process of arms control and monitoring which would give every nation the responsibility of monitoring the weaponry so that no single country would have the capability to destroy another.
Therefore, the correct answer is Shared by the leaders of all nations.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/11043868
The answer to this question is: <span>individual action and personal responsibility
In general, business people in united states do not care about everything else as long as you can give results.
This really different in Asian culture for example, where most of the business people often value politeness and respectful behaviors.</span>
Answer: civil law
Explanation:
Civil law is sometimes referred to as non criminal law. It's the law which relates to the settling disputes that occur between private citizens. It deals with the behavior which bring about an injury to the other private party e.g. defamation, breach of contract, property damage etc.
In this scenario, we can infer that this is a breach of contract as the soaps and lotions were not delivered on that particular day. Therefore, it's a civil law and not a criminal law.
Answer:
D. strong ego.
Explanation:
Strong ego: The term strong ego refers to the process in which an individual believes in his or her abilities to cope up with difficult situations or problems and thinks that he or she will find alternatives or various ways to deal with ongoing struggles.
An individual having a strong ego can face or deal with whatever comes in his or her way without losing a sense of self.
People having strong ego strength are considered to be very resilient while facing difficult life situations.
In the question above, Hafez shows signs of a strong ego.
