Powers of the Executive Branch:

Sociologists argue that what is considered deviant varies from culture to culture. Give an example of something that might be co

Mkey [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

<u>One of the examples of behavior that would be considered deviant in one society and not in the other is the eating of certain animals. The examples are:</u>

Some societies in India consider the cow a sacred animal and never would consume beef.
Muslim societies do not eat pork meat.
Insects are considered a tasty snack in many countries, including Thailand, while it would be considered gross by many people from the west.
While some of the western European countries (like France and Belgium) have specialized butcher shops and restaurants for horse meat, eating it would most likely be considered taboo in the US or UK.
The most radical example is the eating of dogs, which occurs in some Asian countries, most notably China. There is even a whole festival for dog meat consumption in Yulin, and every year there are protests across the globe because of this event. Slaughtering dogs for meat consumption is prohibited in the US and plenty of other countries.

<u>With all of this, we can conclude that some food consumption can be seen as deviant in some parts of the world, while in others it is a normal occurrence and part of the every-day diet.</u>

Despite various taboos and laws, what we have to understand is that our connection to the animals is culturally constructed. The fact that people of the US feel closer to dogs, cats, and horses, but not to sheep and pigs, is not the fact supported by nature. There is nothing in nature itself and the nutrition of horses, insects, and various other species that prevents us to eat them. These deviances surrounding different meats are all culturally constructed. <u>This does not mean they are less real or that we should eat all the animals, just that we have to realize that our ways are no naturally more or less right than someone else’s.</u>

4 0

3 years ago

When we view the overall emphasis of the Bible, the primary view indicated by the scriptures is _______________.

Viefleur [7K]

The bible is known as a holy book. When we view the overall emphasis of the Bible, the primary view indicated by the scriptures that the Bible is <u>redemptive </u>story, told by God as author and main character.

<h3>What is the scripture about?</h3>

The Scriptures and nature are known to be the primary source of knowledge of God.

They are said to consist of Doctrinal confessions, tradition, etc. that is guided by the Holy Spirit and they are known to be the secondary sources of theology.

It talk about how God redeem man to himself.

see full question below

When we view the overall emphasis of the Bible, the primary view indicated by the scriptures is _______________.

that the Bible provides a roster of role models to emulate

that the Bible serves as a practical guide for a successful life

that the Bible offers a list of rules to follow

that the Bible is redemptive story, told by God as author and main character

Learn more about the bible from

brainly.com/question/25251443

4 0

2 years ago

The dead trees and peeling paint, along with the broken windows and flapping shutters, __________ everyone believe that evil spi

Andrei [34K]

Answer:

The options are

A. made

B. has made

C. makes

D. make

The answer is D. make

Explanation:

The dead trees and peeling paint, along with the broken windows and flapping shutters, make everyone believe that evil spirits haunt the deserted Sinclair house.

The answer is make because a plural subject goes with a plural verb and vice versa.

In this case ‘The dead trees and peeling paint, along with the broken windows and flapping shutters’ are plural subjects and will go with a plural verb which is ‘make’ , ‘makes’ is a singular verb.

6 0

3 years ago

Failure to be Informed – Consumer responsibility is to be informed. What does this mean?

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

There was a failure on the consumer's side to inform the other. try agian

3 0

3 years ago

The leader of a political party says a rival political party is "irresponsible because they are destroying the livelihood of mil

PolarNik [594]

Answer:

d. The first statement more likely uses emotive language and the second is more likely a fact.

Explanation:

The statement of the leader of the political rivalry includes highly emotional language that may or may not be accurate in describing reality. Even if it was true that farmers are suffering, the politician is likely exagerating the claims in order to rile up his supporters.

The statement of the economist is a fact. The economist is citing evidence, and is not expressing an opinion on the subject matter.

3 0

4 years ago