Answer:
[..]This would be a mass protest organization.
Explanation:
A mass protest organization is a kind of social movement organization that seeks changes in society by protesting and demonstrating. It consists of large and informal groups of persons or organizations which center their attention in determined political or social problems. To make it clearer, they introduce, oppose, or bring down a social change.
They determine how many judges are in the supreme court.
Answer:
In the description section below where the overview including its condition given is outlined.
Explanation:
Representatives of another third estate proclaimed together a parliamentary assembly throughout June 1789. Throughout the draught French Constitution, autocratic monarchy or government was refused.
Louis XVI accepted that there should be a constitution or framework regulating his authority as well as rights.
<span>Her therapist is demonstrating "unconditional positive regard".
Unconditional positive regard refers to an idea created by the humanistic analyst Carl Rogers, is the essential acknowledgment and support of a man paying little heed to what the individual says or does. Rogers trusted that unrestricted positive respect is fundamental for sound improvement and endeavored to set up it as a remedial part. Through giving unqualified positive respect, humanistic advisors look to enable their customers to acknowledge and assume liability for themselves.
</span>
<h3>
Hello there!</h3><h3>
Answer: I would say grant the motion that the salesperson filed</h3>
The reason why I would say that the court rule for the sales person by grating the motion because the elderly lady wasn't very specific in her claim.
The elderly women would need to have more proof or evidence on how the salesperson made fraudulent statements that made her sign the contract.
The plaintiff, or elderly women's "claim for relief" would not specify the outcome that the elderly women wants to see in court. This would make her statement "insufficient."
If the elderly women told the court what outcome she wanted in the court and what she would do with the outcome would've possibly have the court lean towards her, but since she didn't have that, they would possibly grant the motion that was filed by the salesperson.
<h3>I hope this helps!</h3><h3>Best regards,</h3><h3>MasterInvestor</h3>
