Answer:
Larsen Inc. provides free lunch coupons to its employees.
Explanation:
As private business self-regulation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) intends to make contribution towards societal goals which include a philanthropic work, an activism or a work of charitable nature or engagement in volunteering work or supporting ethical practices. When Larsen Inc. provides free lunch coupons to its employees, it does a charitable or philanthropic work, which will help boost employees' satisfaction. It will not only make them tension-free of their lunch it will also generate a good feeling among them for the company. Larsen Inc. fulfills it CSR by spending money on their employees' health and welfare.
Answer:
Operant Conditioning
Explanation:
Operant Conditioning -
It is one of the learning method , which occurs by some punishments and rewards for a particular task or behavior , is referred to as operant conditioning.
As, from the scenario of the question,
Millie opted to get groceries from online platform , rather than offline , as it wait a lot of her time , while purchasing groceries from the supermarket.
Therefore ,
Millie demonstrates , operant conditioning.
Answer:
the Aral Sea gets approximately one fifth of its water supply through rainfall, while the rest is delivered to it by the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers.
Explanation:
<span>Identify ways in which different societies handle or respond to similar phenomena.
Sociology is simply the study of society and how various social institutes such as: education, religion, employment, family, etc. function. A sociologist would be in investigating a topic such as: "The difference between female employment rates in developed vs. developing countries". This example involves investigating the same social phenomenon (female employment) in two different kinds of societies.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
b. social distinctions were more blurred than in europe.
Explanation:
<u>British taxes practically caused the revolution of the colonies</u>, therefore option "A" is not the correct answer.
That various religious and ethnic groups coexisted in the American colonies was no reason for colonists to tend to support British royalty (D).<em> In fact, diversity and immigration were one of the reasons why the thirteen colonies flourished so quickly.</em>
The colonists didn´t feel that British royalty did anything for them as they had to survive on their own, dedicating themselves mainly to agriculture. <u>The difference in wealth between the inhabitants of England and the colonists was very large, therefore the colonists did not feel entitled to the rights of English citizens (C). Not because the American colonies had a great diversity of religious and ethnic groups.</u>
Because the American colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups, social distinctions were more blurred than in Europe (B). In New England, diversity was ironically the point in common that its inhabitants had and that would lead them to fight for their independence.
