Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
Answer:
13.73%
Explanation:
Effective annual rate = (1 + APR / m ) ^m - 1
M = number of compounding = 365
= 0.1373 = 13.73%
Answer:
If Verizon charges an optimal two-part price thenconsumer surplus will be zero.
Explanation:
Given a competitive market the consumer surplus will be the area of the demand curve above the market price
This is, between the intersection point with Y axis and a parallel at market price. Ofter represent as a triangle
If a monopolistic company maximize profit It will decrease this consumer surplus as much as it can to gain it from itself.
First it will set price equal to his marginal revenue.
Then, if possible it will charge two tariff a fixed component and a variable component per usage This will extrac all consumer surplus in favor of the firm leaving a consumer surplus of zero.
If Verizon charges an optimal two-part price thenconsumer surplus will be zero.
Non-organic food is cheaper, and often has brand names, which appeal to the consumer more than an organic brand does.
Answer:
$12,300
Explanation:
I will assume that Joseph invested in the fund on July 14, 2013.
We have to calculate the future value to March 15, 2014 (8 months later).
since the interest is compounded semi annually, it will earn interest on January 14, 2014.
Future value = $12,000 x (1 + 2.5%) = $12,300
since the fund is going to earn interests again on July 14, 2014, the value on march 14 is the same = $12,300
