Balancing Power in the Constitution
1) Checks and Balances- This idea is implemented in the Constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. For example, the legislative branch (Congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (President). If the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. Vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. This check on power ensures that Congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.
2) Federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix America's weak political structure. Before the US Constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the Articles of Confederation. This constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.
3) Anti-Federalists do not want to ratify the Constitution unless it includes a Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalists are worried that the Constitution gives too much power to the federal government. Having a strong central government caused problems when the US was still part of Great Britain. This is why the Anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system. the Anti-Federalists. In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights
Great Britain is the <span>land that was promised to the iroquois confederacy after the british conquered the fort of ticonderoga. They ensured that they will all cover the expenses in the war but the result to this is the bankrupt of its treasures.</span>
The answer would be the first one
The U.S wanted to remain neutral, based on what Woodrow Wilson wanted, but after Germany started sinking U.S ships, they got included.
Answer:
good
Explanation:
if you use a national approach things can get solved faster for example the Corona virus
