I have! It's one of my favorite books. I'd say the theme is centered around the saying, "home is where the heart is." and plays on the magic of childhood. In Mr. Craven, his stern brother, and Mary’s parents, readers have found evidence of a failed and fallen adult world. When Mary first arrives at <span>Misselthwaite in winter, she's spoiled rotten and downright rude. But she begins to garden. And when her flowers sprout in the spring, so does Mary's heart of gold. Hope that helps you! </span>
Hello there.
Answers:
1) E calm and cool.
2) A <span>The number of people moving to San Francisco is rising.
</span>Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck Studying ^-^<span>
</span>
Explanation:
Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.
But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."
A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".
But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.
Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.
Answer:
The old house had to perish , But realized I ensure my parent I would not. Compelling I had to I love to start fire's but before I could do that the bank can and told me your parent said they anticipate that you would do this so when you turned 18 the house belong to the bank.
The correct arrangement of the events chronologically in <em>To Build a Fire</em> is:
- The man is given advice and a warning by the old timer about travelling alone in such low temperatures.
- The man continues his journey up the left fork.
- He arrives at the fork.
- The man heads up the trail with the dog with only light supplies.
- The man's foot goes through the ice and he is wet.
- The dog puts its foot through the ice.
- Now increasingly aware of the cold, the man lights a fire and eats his sandwich.
- The fire is put out by snowfall from the tree above.
- With great difficulty, he lights another fire.
- The man tries to kill the dog.
- The dog leaves.
- The man freezes to death.
<h3>What is a sequence of events?</h3>
This is known to be the order in which events take place in a story.
Hence, we can the chronological order in which the story is told reveals the journey of the man with his dog, building a fire, and the sad turn of events which led to the death of the man due to the cold temperature.
Read more about <em>sequence of events </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1620200
#SPJ1
