I dont have options but i can sayEach of these questions is asking you to figure out how g(x) would be graphed based on some other function, f(x), except we're gonna make some changes to f(x) first. For example, let's look at part (a). You're told that g(x) = 2f(x)+3. 1. Whatever f(x) is, 2f(x) would take all of the y values and double them.2. Whatever that turns out to be, "+3" would add 3 to every y value. So, to translate (1, -2), first we double the y value...so that'd be -2 * 2, or -4. Then we add 3, which gives 1. So, the point (1, -2) becomes (1, 1). [EDIT: Um, no, -4 + 1 isn't 1. It's -1. My bad! MBW] Part (b) is a little bit trickier: 1. Whatever f(x) is, by adding 1 to x, it actually shifts the graph left by 1, even though it sorta feels like you should be shifting it 1 to the right. Let's not get too far into the details here, so for the moment, f(x+1) means "shift the graph of f to the left by 1." In other words, subtract 1 from x to get the new point. 2. Whatever f(x+1) is, then the "-3" would subtract 3 to every y value. So, if (1, -2) was on the original graph, then f(x+1) would be shifted to the left by 1...so that's (0, -2). And then, we subtract 3 from y, so that'd be (0, -5). Basically, anything inside the parentheses, like f(x+1), messes with the x coordinate of the point, and anything outside the parentheses, like -f(x) or f(x) + 3, messes with the y coordinate. For the last two, I'll give you a few hints and see if you can take it from there. For part (c): f(2x), even though you think it might double the value of x, actually divides the value of x by 2.For part (d): the trick here is to ignore the "-x" until the last step. Deal with the f(x-1) first (which shifts the x coordinate...which way?), then the negative outside of f(x) (which flips the sign of the y coordinate), then the +3 outside of f(x)...and then, at the end, the "-x" would flip the sign of the x coordinate. I hope this helps point you in the right direction!
Answer:
c = -75/14 OR c = -5.357143
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplify both equations:
1.2x + 7 - 5x =
-3.8x + 7
2.2c - 3 = 2(6 - c) + 7c =
c = −5.357143
OR
c = -75/14
The question wasn't quite clear, if this wasn't correct, please elaborate on what needed to be solved, and I'll fix my answer.
Hope this helped!
Using the normal distribution, it is found that a production worker has to make $542.64 a week to be in the top 30% of wage earners.
<h3>Normal Probability Distribution</h3>
In a normal distribution with mean 
and standard deviation 
, the z-score of a measure X is given by:
- It measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean.
- After finding the z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score, which is the percentile of X.
In this problem:
- The mean is of
.
- The standard deviation is of
.
- The lower bound of the top 30% is the 70th percentile, which is X when Z has a p-value of 0.7, so <u>X when Z = 0.84.</u>
A production worker has to make $542.64 a week to be in the top 30% of wage earners.
You can learn more about the normal distribution at brainly.com/question/24663213
M2 + 2d + 8 + d
5(2) + 2(4) + 8 + 4
10 + 8 + 8 + 4
10 + 16 + 4
26 + 4
30
The sides
12-3a
12-3a
4(2a-5)=8a-40
so for perimeter we + them
(12-3a)+(12-3a)+(8a-40)
=
2a-16
