Answer:
d.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's examine each statement:
Option A: m<CUD = m<VUM (CORRECT)
Rationale: vertical angles are congruent to each other.
Option B: m<AUV + m<DUA = 180 (CORRECT)
Rationale: angles on a straight line
Option C: m<MUC - m<MUD = m<CUD (CORRECT)
Rationale:
m<MUC = m<MUD + m<CUD
Subtract m<MUD from each side
m<MUC - m<MUD = m<CUD
Option D is FALSE
Rationale:
m<PUD + m <VUP = 180° (angles on a straight line)
m<PUM + m<CUA ≠ 180°
Therefore,
m<PUD + m<VUP = m<PUM + m<CUA IS FALSE.
Answer:
half apart
Step-by-step explanation:
hope it help you
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<h3>He should have found 8 as the exponent, not –8.</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression simplified by Pablo as 
On simplification we have;
According to one of the law of indices 
Applying this law to the question will give;
Based on the calculation above, the exponent of 2 is 8 which means that Pablo should have found 8 as the exponent, not –8.
Answer: financial stabibilities is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
