The signs and symptoms of poisoning in children is Burns or redness around the mouth and lips.
<h3>What is
poisoning in children?</h3>
poisoning in children is the injection of substances which can be harmful to their internal organs and if not taken care of instantly can result in death.
It should be noted that The signs and symptoms of poisoning in children is Burns or redness around the mouth and lips.
Learn more about poisoning at
brainly.com/question/20302310
#SPJ1
Answer:
Do you need a full explanation?
Explanation:
The way in which women provide food for their families in Nicaragua is: B. they sell their produce at the market.
<h3>What is Nicaragua?</h3>
Nicaragua is set between the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean and it is considered to be the largest country in the Central American republics.
<h3>The characteristics of Nicaragua.</h3>
- A dramatic terrain of lakes.
Basically, Nicaragua is a country that is richly blessed with vast land and water resources which are mainly used for the cultivation of various agricultural products.
In Nicaragua, the women are able to provide food for their families through the sales of their agricultural produce at the market.
Read more on Nicaragua here: brainly.com/question/25965749
your answer is the branch locations
your welcome have a good day or the best of a bad one
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
