Acceleration reaches a maximum
I think so :))
Answer:
introduce another character vs. society conflict.
Explanation:
Sylvia Plath born in October 1932, was a short-story writer, poet and novelist of America descent. Most of the works of this Massachusetts –born lady was published when she died of depression in 1963.
In one of her works, the Initiation, she rightly conveyed a story of a young woman who was trying to be in an exclusive club as a way of fitting in with friends or societal expectations. She did not achieve that when she later found how best she could be herself and through conflict, characterization and symbolism, Sylvia path showed the importance of being oneself.
The American short-story writer, in this work, brought in the principal and teachers into the picture as an instance of conflict between society and individual expression.
Answer:variable - interval
Explanation: In the this scenario, The humanities instructor is using a variable-interval schedule of reinforcement. The instructor used the word 'surprise' meaning the time and date of the test isn't fixed and the quizzes will come up at unpredictable time intervals. This kind of reinforcement results in a steady response rate as it keeps students on their toes simply due to the fact that they have no idea of when the quizzes are coming up.
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank.
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
