The answer will be B. It increased
harry should add $20 per pound
The method of identifying the advantages and disadvantages of various options by looking at the incremental impact on total revenue and total cost caused by a very modest change in the value or input of each alternative (just one unit). Instead of making decisions based on totals or averages, marginal analysis encourages those that focus on small or gradual changes to resources. Examining the costs and possible gains of particular business operations or financial choices is known as marginal analysis. The objective is to ascertain whether the benefits from the change in activity will be great enough to outweigh the costs.
To know more about marginal analysis refer to brainly.com/question/7412432
#SPJ4
Answer:
$1,035,459.51
Explanation:
First we must determine the issuing value:
- cash flow 1 = $60,000
- cash flow 1 = $60,000
- cash flow 1 = $60,000
- cash flow 1 = $60,000
- cash flow 1 = $1,060,000
using an excel spreadsheet to calculate the bond's price with a discount value of 5%:
the bonds were sold at $1,043,294.77
the effective interest expense = bond's price x market interest = $1,043,294.77 x 5% = $52,164.74
bond's value = bond's price - (coupon payment - effective interest) = $1,043,294.77 - ($60,000 - $52,164.74) = $1,035,459.51
Answer:
LIFO ending inventory $ 544.00
Weighted average: $ 565.44
FIFO ending invetory: $ 590.00
Explanation:
weighted-average:
1,449 / 41 = 35,34
Ending Inventory
16 x 35.34
LIFo we pick the first 16 units as the latest were sold:
8 units at $ 33 = $ 264
8 units at $ 35 = $ 280
Total ending inventory $ 544
FIFo we pick the last as the first one are the first being sold
15 units at 37 = 555
1 unit at 35 = 35
total ending 590
Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
