Analysis the motives that might cause a person to safe rather than to spend

1 answer:

4 0

There are various factors which results people to save rather than spend. First and the most important motive are the bank interest rates on saving. If bank gives very high rates of interest on savings, then more people will be willing to save because the return on savings will be higher than the return on spending. Secondly, if a person has planned to buy expensive luxuries in a near future, he might not spend his income, rather he will also be saving his income for this luxury item. Thirdly, increase in income and wealth is also an important influence on saving. It is true that increase in income increases spending but the same rule happens for savings also especially when the rate of inflation is high.

You might be interested in

If you graduate high school as a math scholar, do you still have to take math classes in college to get an associate degree?

alexdok [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

yes

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I need help please.

d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

the answer is true

Explanation:

because the force is greater than that which is needed to compel compliance

5 0

3 years ago

Three years ago, the state of Nevada passed a law making the recreational use of marijuana legal. Yet such use of marijuana is a

Oksanka [162]

The basis on which Nevada had the authority to <u>override a federal law</u> is <u>Option A</u>. ... widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law.

<h3>Can a state override a federal law?</h3>

The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution is Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

The Supremacy Clause means that the federal constitution and laws take precedence over state laws and constitutions.

<h3>Answer Options:</h3>

A. Nevada doesn’t have the authority to override federal law. Federal law stands supreme. Yet, the force of widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law. We also saw this effect during Prohibition in the 1920s – which showed that even constitutional law has limits if a substantial part of the population does not support that law.

B. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has the statutory authority to allow exceptions to federal drug laws.

C. States have precedence over federal authorities on matters of recreational drug use.

D. The executive authority of the governor of Nevada makes such laws exceptions to federal prohibitions. By virtue of signing the legislation making marijuana legal, Governor Brian Sandoval’s executive authority gave pot’s legal possession precedence over federal law.

Thus, the basis on which Nevada had the authority to <u>override a federal law</u> is <u>Option A</u>. ... widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law.

Learn more about the Supremacy Clause at brainly.com/question/12959391

6 0

2 years ago

8. Why do all drug cases have to have the drugs analyzed before court?

dusya [7]

Answer: They do it because it might look like cocaine or LSD but that doesn't mean it actually is

Explanation:The prosecution must prove that a seized substance is indeed the illicit drug it claims it is by sending the evidence to a crime lab for analysis. The crime lab analyst then must testify at trial in order for the prosecution to make its case.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How might reading about a case or hearing about it on TV influence jurors?

IceJOKER [234]

Another way that media coverage changes the way that judges and juries act in the legal system, is by giving them extra information into the case, or the clients behind the case. ... This means that from the moment a juror enters the courtroom, they're already biased in the way they make decisions regarding the case.

3 0

3 years ago