Lawyers, accountants, and other professionals typically price by adding a standard markup for profit. This exemplifies _______

balu736 [363]

High quality coffee clothes makeup watches drones

6 0

2 years ago

__________ is a condition in international trade when the value of the imports into a nation is greater than the value of its ex

Tema [17]

Answer: The answer is trade deficit.

Explanation: Balance of trade is represented by net exports (exports minus imports) and is usually influenced by factors that affect international trade. Those factors inflation include: inflation, natural endowment, exchange rate, trade policy, pandemics (e.g., coronavirus).

A trade surplus occurs when the value of a nation's exports is more than the value of its imports. However, trade deficit occurs when the opposite happens.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A proposed new project has projected sales of $132,000, costs of $66,000, and depreciation of $13,500. The tax rate is 30%. Calc

Verizon [17]

Answer:Operating cash flow $ _50,250__

Yes, the answer is same in each case

Explanation:

a) EBIT + Depreciation - Tax

= ($132,000-$66,000-$13,500) + $13,500 - Tax

= $52,500 + $13,500-(30% x $52,500)

=$52,500 + $13,500-15,750

EBIT + Depreciation - Tax=$50,250

b)Top down OCF = EBIT - (EBIT x Tax) + Depreciation

Top down OCF = $52,500 - ($52,500 x 30%) + $13,500

Top down OCF = $52,500 -15,750 + $13,500

Top down OCF =$50,250

Tax shield OCF =(Sales - Cost)(1-t) + Depreciation (t)

Tax shield OCF = ($132,000-$66,000) (1-0.30) + ($13,500 x0.30)

Tax shield OCF =$66,000 x 0.7 + 4,050

Tax shield OCF = 46,200+ 4,050

Tax shield OCF = $50,250

Bottom Up OCF = Net Income + Dep

Bottom Up OCF =($132,000-$66,000-$13,500 ) - Tax ) + Dep

Bottom Up OCF = $52,500-(0.3 x $52,500 )+ $13,500

Bottom Up OCF = $52,500 -15,750 + $13,500

Bottom Up OCF =$50,250

2. Yes, the answer is same in each case

4 0

3 years ago

You found your dream house. It will cost you $300000 and you will put down $30000 as a down payment. For the rest you get a 30-y

Andrews [41]

Answer:

$1,282.80

Explanation:

The PMT formula is used for this question. The attachment is shown below:

The NPER shows the time period

Given that,

Present value = $300,000 - $30000 = $270,000

Future value = $0

Rate of interest = 4% ÷ 12 months = 0.33%

NPER = 30 years × 12 months = 360 months

The formula is shown below:

= PMT(Rate;NPER;-PV;FV;type)

The present value come in negative

So, after solving this, the answer is $1,282.80

5 0

3 years ago

A debtor owed a creditor $1,200 on a promissory note that was due on August 1. After the debtor told the creditor that he might

Ilya [14]

Answer:

The correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as the options are omitted. The question is therefore completed before answering the question by providing the options as follows:

A. No, because the debtor incurred no additional detriment that would serve as consideration for the new agreement.

B. Yes, because it would have cost the creditor $1,200 to purchase the entertainment system himself.

C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

D. Yes, because the new agreement between the debtor and the creditor is enforceable with or without

Explanation of the answer is now provided as follows.

It is possible to enforce the two parties' new agreement as an accord.

An accord can be described as an agreement in which one party to an existing contract agrees to accept some other, different performance from the other party in lieu of the performance that the other party is obligated to provide. In principle, an agreement must be backed by payment, but the consideration can be less than the amount agreed upon in the preceding contract if it is of a different character or the claim is to be paid to a third party. The responsibility of the debtor to supply the creditor with a new entertainment system was enough fresh consideration to constitute a legal agreement in this case.

When a party's responsibility is modified in some way, as the debtor's duty was in this case, the preceding legal duty rule does not apply. It makes no difference whether the creditor's benefit in the accord arrangement is equal to the original debt's worth; courts will find appropriate consideration if the consideration is fresh or different in any way. The difference in the debtor's obligation, that is, payment is in the form of an entertainment system rather than cash) is enough to sustain the accord arrangement, regardless of how much the entertainment system would have cost the creditor.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) does not apply because the original agreement was not for the sale of goods. The underlying commitment in this case was to pay a debt secured by a promissory note.

Therefore, the correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

6 0

2 years ago

Lawyers, accountants, and other professionals typically price by adding a standard markup for profit. This exemplifies ________.