Answer:
b.to protect new laws enacted by the Civil Rights Act of 1866
Answer:
B. it is often transitory—that is, it is brief and passing.
Explanation:
There are lots of different kinds of collective behavior, so trying to identify a specific set of standards or reasons to suit all is very difficult. Also, episodes of collective behavior —such as riots, social panic, and more— are unpredictable and last for a short time, which represents a difficulty for sociologists who want to analyze them as they take place. People involved in these events are often strangers to each other, making it even harder to determine who took part in them.
Answer:
to change the Nepalese society because how urban is poor in Nepal
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
Answer:
four-month lame duck period between the election and inauguration of the president.
Explanation:
"lame duck" session of Congress is one that takes place after the election for the next Congress has been held, but before the current Congress has reached the end of its constitutional term.
Congressional elections were generally held on the same day. The result of these scheduling decisions was that there was a long, four-month lame duck period between the election and inauguration of the president.
