Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
yes because it separates the economy more
Answer:
What is the purpose of replication?
- B. to produce copies of a DNA molecule
<u>Answer:
</u>
Nullification proposed that the states had the right to decide which national laws states would accept.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- With a view to dispense greater power to the states and to maintain their autonomy, John Calhoun proposed that the state governments should be allowed to choose which federal laws did they not want to implement in their states.
- The demands put up by the theory were never processed by any federal courts of the US as it is deemed that such a law would prove to be threat to the integrity of the nation.
