Answer:
The answer is c.
Explanation:
During World war I congress passed a espionage act which prohibited individuals from being disloyal to the Wilson administration to be drafted for the war. Some people dissented on this act because it placed undue restrictions on individual liberties. However, after the war, the supreme court upheld the government's restrictions on individual liberties on the grounds that the war posed a clear danger to national security. Thus, the supreme court upheld sentencing on people who were convicted of protesting against these policies during the war.
Answer:
My dad's friend once told me that there's only <u>three </u><em><u>major</u></em><u> reasons</u> as to why the government/politics are important:
<u>1.</u> Governmental and political decisions impact almost every aspect of our everyday lives.
<u>2.</u> Having knowledge of politics helps make you an informed voter.
And <u>3.</u> Politics are entertaining.
Okay, to be honest, politics don't really entertain <em>me</em>, but you know what, that's just my opinion, I know that plenty of people find politics entertaining, I'm just not one of them.
But yeah, anyway.
There are your top three :)
have a nice day, hope i helped, and if so, brainliest is always appreciated
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
Answer:
After Japan surrendered in 1945, ending World War II, Allied forces led by the United States occupied the nation, bringing drastic changes. Japan was disarmed, its empire dissolved, its form of government changed to a democracy, and its economy and education system reorganized and rebuilt.
Answer:
natural law
Explanation:
John Locke, whose ideas were reflected in the ideas of the founding fathers of the United States, wrote back in 1690 that the natural right of a person is the right for protection of life, freedom and property from threats and encroachment from the outside.