<span>It might be stated that Kant's three imperative formulations are the Universal Law, Humanity and Autonomy. The first one might “act in accordance with a maxim if you can at the same time will it as a universal law”, the second might “act so that you can use humanity, rather in yourself or another, as an end (in itself), and never merely as a means”, and the last one might act in accordance with maxims that would be enacted into law be a legislator and member of a realm of ends. On the other hand, he defines Counsel of Prudence as the “hypothetical Imperatives that have happiness as their end; ex: make friends so as to be happy”.<span>
</span></span>
Explanation:
This is a question that must be analyzed historically in order to be better understood from my point of view. Analyzing, throughout each period, the positions of men and women in society, it is possible to understand how gender stereotypes were being formed and conceived as a natural way of representing the characteristics of each gender.
Despite the fact that society is undergoing positive change with regard to the reduction of sexist thoughts and the inclusion of women in important positions in the labor market, in politics and in science, there is still a patriarchal conception built in society that differentiates men and women according with gender stereotypes used to be able to reaffirm what is the role of each in social life.
Answer:
Tilden, won the popular vote with a majority, but there were conflicting electors from four states which meant no one had a majority in the electoral college. ... Whereas, the Democrats argued they should be decided by Congress, which had a Democrat majority.
Someone who is unhappy and lacks self control.
Answer:
(a.) The resulting data set consisted of how many observations?
Explanation: