The answer would be the second choice
he's well known as king tut
We call it the Colombian Exchange <span />
Answer:
The correct option is B: could create their own Miranda warning if it communicated the same message
Explanation:
According to the Duckworth v. Eagan (1988), in which the convicted claimed that the Miranda warnings were not corrected stated, the Supreme Court held that it is not a must that Miranda warnings must be in the exact format as described in the Miranda, as long as it conveys the rights of a suspect to the individual, it is valid. The convict claimed that "if and when you go to court" as used by the police officer to him rendered the Miranda warning inadequate, but the Supreme Court ruled that it does not.
Answer:
d. make a "no-nonsense" accusation of the other.
Explanation:
Bullying tactics are emotional devices that play into one's insecurities through false accusations that divert the focus of the debate. They are designed to get the public drawn to the accuser's point of view and to demonize their opponent with inconvenient truths or false accusations. In most, if not all cases, intimidation tactics are basically ad hominem attacks.
Based on this, we can say that the letter D is the correct answer to your question.
