All categories

2 years ago

1,how do you characterize international dimension of legal business environment?

Business

1 answer:

aivan3 [116]2 years ago

6 0

One of the ways to characterize international dimension of legal business environment is to:

b,explain the relevance of each factors and the interplays with the international business activities.

<h3>What are Legal Business Dimensions?</h3>

This refers to the different parts of the legal business system which are contained in a law firm and they can be divided into:

Civil law
Property law
Litigation
Environmental law, etc

With this in mind, we can see that these different dimensions of the legal business environment are important to the international business activities and as such they all need each other to properly function.

You might be interested in

A businessperson is setting up a new automatic car wash and is choosing between two fully automated machines. The first machine

Grace [21]

Answer:

i wil do it asap asap

Explanation:

asap asap

5 0

3 years ago

g Novelli Corporation makes a product whose variable overhead standards are based on direct labor-hours. The quantity standard i

hram777 [196]

Answer:

Variable overhead efficiency variance= $110 favorable

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

The quantity standard is 1.4 hours per unit.

The variable overhead rate standard is $11.00 per hour.

The company produced 1,450 units using 2,020 direct labor-hours.

To calculate the variable overhead efficiency variance, we need to use the following formula:

Variable overhead efficiency variance= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)*Standard rate

standard quantity= 1.4*1,450= 2,030

Variable overhead efficiency variance= (2,030 - 2,020)*11

Variable overhead efficiency variance= $110 favorable

5 0

3 years ago

Quarter Real GDP (billions of dollars) Long-Run Trend of Real GDP (billions of dollars) 1 4,000 4,000 2 4,160 4,120 3 4,326 4,24

bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

Explanation:

As per given data

Quarter Real GDP ($billions) Long-Run Trend of Real GDP ($billions)

1 4,000 4,000

2 4,160 4,120

3 4,326 4,244

4 4,413 4,371

5 4,501 4,502

6 4,591 4,637

7 4,499 4,776

8 4,409 4,919

9 4,673 5,067

10 4,954 5,219

11 5,252 5,376

12 5,376 5,537

Growth of GDP = (DGP of Current/recent period - GDP of Prior period) / DGP of Prior period

In this question prior period is quarter 10 and current /recent period is quarter 11.

So, formula will be

Growth of GDP = (DGP of quarter 11 - GDP of quarter 10) / GDP of quarter 10

As we need to calculate the real GDP growth the formula will be as follow

Growth of real GDP = (Real DGP of quarter 11 - Real GDP of quarter 10) / Real GDP of quarter 10

Growth of real GDP = ($5,252 billion - $4,954 billion) / $4,954 billion

Growth of real GDP = $298 billion / $4,954 billion

Growth of real GDP = 6.02% = 6%

3 0

3 years ago

An investment costs $152,000 and has projected cash inflows of $71,800, $86,900, and −$11,200 for Years 1 to 3, respectively. If

Radda [10]

Answer:

No; The IRR is less than the required return.

Explanation:

Calculation of IRR is given by the formula: Lr x NPVL / NPVL - NPVH x (Hr - Lr)

where

Lr = Lower rate of discount

Hr = Higher rate of discount

NPVH = NPV at Higher discount rate

NPVL = NPV at Lower discount rate

Assume a low discount rate of 1% and a high rate of 20%

<u>NPV at 1%</u>

<u>Particulars Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3</u>

Cash flows 152,000 71,800 86,900 (11,200)

DCF 1% 1 0.99 0.98 0.97

Present values (152,000) 71,082 85,162 (10,864)

NPV = $6,620

<u />

<u>NPV at 20%</u>

<u>Particulars Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3</u>

Cash flows 152,000 71,800 86,900 (11,200)

DCF 20% 1 0.83 0.69 0.58

Present values (152,000) 59,594 59,961 (6,496)

NPV = ($38,941)

Substituting values in the IRR formula we have:

1% x [($6,620 / ($6620 - (38,941))] x (20% - 1%) = 2.06%

Therefore we reject the project because it gives an IRR lower than the required rate of return of 15.5%

8 0

3 years ago

A marketing plan includes this marketing objective: "Create positive feelings about our brand." What is the main problem with th

Over [174]

I think is C.
it is not specific and measurable.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers