The answer is <span>They both suggest that snakes evolved from an ancestor with legs.
The second choice is not correct since we have no information about pythons and other snakes. We only have the relationship between geckos, snakes and legless eels. So, it is said that </span><span>snakes in general have more DNA sequences in common with four-legged geckos than they do with legless eels. This means that snakes are closer to geckos than the legless eels. We cannot conclude from this information which evolved from which, but we can say that </span><span>snakes evolved from an ancestor with legs.
In different case, if the snakes had more DNA sequence in common with legless eels, we would conclude that the snakes evolved from an ancestor without legs.</span>
The answer to this question is
B: the theory of evolution
I hyope this is correct and helps
The study of human interaction with the natural world over time is environmental history, emphasizing the active role that nature plays in influencing human affairs and vice versa. ... The first, nature itself and its change over time, includes human physical impact on the land, water, atmosphere, and biosphere of the Earth.
